» Articles » PMID: 29402437

Auditory Prediction During Speaking and Listening

Overview
Journal Brain Lang
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 Feb 7
PMID 29402437
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present EEG study, the role of auditory prediction in speech was explored through the comparison of auditory cortical responses during active speaking and passive listening to the same acoustic speech signals. Two manipulations of sensory prediction accuracy were used during the speaking task: (1) a real-time change in vowel F1 feedback (reducing prediction accuracy relative to unaltered feedback) and (2) presenting a stable auditory target rather than a visual cue to speak (enhancing auditory prediction accuracy during baseline productions, and potentially enhancing the perturbing effect of altered feedback). While subjects compensated for the F1 manipulation, no difference between the auditory-cue and visual-cue conditions were found. Under visually-cued conditions, reduced N1/P2 amplitude was observed during speaking vs. listening, reflecting a motor-to-sensory prediction. In addition, a significant correlation was observed between the magnitude of behavioral compensatory F1 response and the magnitude of this speaking induced suppression (SIS) for P2 during the altered auditory feedback phase, where a stronger compensatory decrease in F1 was associated with a stronger the SIS effect. Finally, under the auditory-cued condition, an auditory repetition-suppression effect was observed in N1/P2 amplitude during the listening task but not active speaking, suggesting that auditory predictive processes during speaking and passive listening are functionally distinct.

Citing Articles

Gamma and Theta/Alpha-Band Oscillations in the Electroencephalogram Distinguish the Content of Inner Speech.

Whitford T, Spencer K, Godwin M, Hirano Y, Chung L, Vodovozov W eNeuro. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39843220 PMC: 11810546. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0297-24.2025.


Does pre-speech auditory modulation reflect processes related to feedback monitoring or speech movement planning?.

Li J, Daliri A, Kim K, Max L Neurosci Lett. 2024; 843():138025.

PMID: 39461704 PMC: 11707600. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2024.138025.


Test-Retest Reliability of Behavioral Assays of Feedforward and Feedback Auditory-Motor Control of Voice and Articulation.

Kapsner-Smith M, Abur D, Eadie T, Stepp C J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023; 67(1):34-48.

PMID: 37992404 PMC: 11000789. DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00038.


Neurophysiological evidence of sensory prediction errors driving speech sensorimotor adaptation.

Kim K, Hinkley L, Brent K, Gaines J, Pongos A, Gupta S bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37961099 PMC: 10634734. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.22.563504.


Mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in a hierarchical state feedback control model of speech.

Kim K, Gaines J, Parrell B, Ramanarayanan V, Nagarajan S, Houde J PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(7):e1011244.

PMID: 37506120 PMC: 10434967. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011244.


References
1.
Henson R . Repetition accelerates neural dynamics: In defense of facilitation models. Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 3(3-4):240-1. DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2012.689962. View

2.
Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi F . Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 1994; 14(5 Pt 2):3208-24. PMC: 6577492. View

3.
Wolpert D, Miall R . Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Netw. 1996; 9(8):1265-1279. DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4. View

4.
Chen S, Liu H, Xu Y, Larson C . Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(2):1157-63. DOI: 10.1121/1.2404624. View

5.
Bourguignon N, Baum S, Shiller D . Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:208. PMC: 4029003. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00208. View