» Articles » PMID: 29392747

Validating Semen Processing for an Intrauterine Program Should Take into Consideration the Inputs, Actions and the Outputs of the Process

Overview
Journal Andrologia
Date 2018 Feb 3
PMID 29392747
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To validate semen preparation via density gradient centrifugation, we took into account the input via the semen sample, the action generated by technical and equipment characteristics and the output measured by the level of performance. Longer periods of abstinence reduced % yield, but increased viscosity and incomplete samples collected had no effect. Under controlled technical and equipment characteristics, precision and reproducibility were validated for density gradient. Additionally, as a good laboratory practice, internal and external quality control measures were implemented to guarantee the level of performance. Inseminating motile sperm count is an important predictive parameter for IUI success. In our group of patients, a yield of an absolute lower limit of 2 million motile spermatozoa was sufficient to contemplate IUI. Pregnancy rate of 13.8% where >2 million rapid progressive spermatozoa were inseminated was significantly higher than the pregnancies (4.4%) obtained with <2 million rapid progressive spermatozoa. This percentage was even higher than the national data registered for IUI (12.2%). To make IUI an attractive first-line treatment, standardization and proper validation of semen preparation procedure are mandatory.

Citing Articles

Sperm DNA Fragmentation after Cryopreservation and Sperm Selection Has No Implications for Clinical Pregnancies and Live Births after Intrauterine Insemination with Donor Sperm.

Sugihara A, Punjabi U, Chimienti T, Goovaerts I, Peeters K, Bouziotis J J Pers Med. 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38138895 PMC: 10745103. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121668.


Is There a Relationship between Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Intra-Uterine Insemination Outcome in Couples with Unexplained or Mild Male Infertility? Results from the ID-Trial.

Sugihara A, Punjabi U, Roelant E, De Neubourg D Life (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36675960 PMC: 9863271. DOI: 10.3390/life13010011.


Variability in Sperm DNA Fragmentation in Men with Mild/Unexplained Subfertility in a Prospective Longitudinal Intrauterine Insemination Trial.

Punjabi U, Roelant E, Peeters K, Goovaerts I, Van Mulders H, De Neubourg D Life (Basel). 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 36362981 PMC: 9698842. DOI: 10.3390/life12111826.


Simplified sperm testing devices: a possible tool to overcome lack of accessibility and inconsistency in male factor infertility diagnosis. An opportunity for low- and middle- income countries.

Onofre J, Geenen L, Cox A, Van der Auwera I, Willendrup F, Andersen E Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021; 13(1):79-93.

PMID: 33889864 PMC: 8051200. DOI: 10.52054/FVVO.13.1.011.


Associated factors to pregnancy in intrauterine insemination.

Vargas-Tominaga L, Alarcon F, Vargas A, Bernal G, Medina A, Polo Z JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019; 24(1):66-69.

PMID: 31693317 PMC: 6993163. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190060.