Risk-equivalent T-score Adjustment for Using Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score (TBS): the Manitoba BMD Registry
Overview
Orthopedics
Affiliations
Introduction: The aim of this study is to develop an approach for using TBS in clinical practice based upon a "risk-equivalent" adjustment to the BMD T-score.
Methods: We identified 45,185 women age 40 years and older with baseline spine and hip DXA, TBS, and FRAX probabilities including femoral neck BMD. Incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF, n = 3925) were identified from population-based health services data (mean follow-up 7.4 years comprising 335,910 person-years). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and BMI were first used to estimate the risk for MOF from BMD T-score alone, then after including TBS and a multiplicative age interaction term. From the parameter estimates, we developed a TBS offset to the BMD T-score based upon change in TBS that would give the same risk as a unit change in BMD T-score for the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine.
Results: All BMD measurements, TBS, and the age interaction term independently predicted MOF (p < 0.001). Measures of risk stratification and model fit were improved for the TBS-adjusted BMD T-score versus the unadjusted BMD T-score (p < 0.001). There was a high level of agreement between MOF probability estimated from TBS-adjusted MOF FRAX probability and FRAX probability using the "risk-equivalent" femoral BMD T-score: MOF probability r = 0.98, slope = 1.02, intercept = - 0.3; hip probability r = 0.95, slope = 1.07, intercept = 0.0.
Conclusions: The BMD-independent effect of lumbar spine TBS on fracture risk can be estimated as a simple offset to the BMD T-score.
Contribution of bone turnover markers (BTMs) and vitamin D to bone health in Iranian elderly women.
Gharibzadeh S, Fahimfar N, Goudarzi S, Yarmohammadi H, Razi F, Khashayar P J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024; 23(2):1871-1877.
PMID: 39610511 PMC: 11599691. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-024-01436-0.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry - is it the gold standard, or is bone mineral density everything?.
Zuchowski P, Jeka D Reumatologia. 2024; 62(1):1-3.
PMID: 38558897 PMC: 10979371. DOI: 10.5114/reum/185706.
Omichi Y, Mima N, Wada K, Okada R, Tamaki Y, Hamada D J Bone Miner Metab. 2023; 42(1):60-68.
PMID: 38057602 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-023-01476-1.
Shevroja E, Reginster J, Lamy O, Al-Daghri N, Chandran M, Demoux-Baiada A Osteoporos Int. 2023; 34(9):1501-1529.
PMID: 37393412 PMC: 10427549. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06817-4.
Bone quality in endocrine diseases: determinants and clinical relevance.
Cianferotti L, Cipriani C, Corbetta S, Corona G, Defeudis G, Lania A J Endocrinol Invest. 2023; 46(7):1283-1304.
PMID: 36918505 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-023-02056-w.