Apical Extrusion of Debris During Root Canal Preparation Using a Novel Nickel-titanium File System: WaveOne Gold

Overview

Journal J Conserv Dent

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2018 Feb 2

PMID 29386779

Citations 7

Authors

Asiye Nur Dincer

Mehmet Burak Guneser

Dilara Arslan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: This study was intended to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris following root canal preparation with three different instrumentation systems.

Materials And Methods: Sixty mandibular incisor teeth were selected and randomly divided into three groups ( = 20/group) according to the instrumentation system used: the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), the Twisted File Adaptive (TFA; SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA), and the WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). All apically extruded debris was collected and dried in preweighed glass vials. The mean weight of the apically extruded debris was obtained using a microbalance. The time for root canal preparation was also recorded. The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance.

Results: The mean weights of apically extruded debris were 0.00035 ± 0.00014 g (PTN); 0.00023 ± 0.0001 g (TFA); and 0.00019 ± 0.0001 g (WOG) ( < 0.01). The mean preparation time value was 301,13 ± 62.14 s (PTN); 234.27 ± 34.88 s (TFA); and 239.8 ± 58.6 s (WOG) ( < 0.05).

Conclusions: The PTN system extruded more debris than the TFA and WOG systems. The TFA and WOG systems were faster than the PTN system.

Citing Articles

Quantitative evaluation of the apically extruded debris from root canals prepared by single-file rotary and reciprocating file systems: An study.

Sharma A, Nirupama D, Nainan M, Vijay R, Thomas H, Yasin S J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 27(8):860-865.

PMID: 39372569 PMC: 11451691. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_275_24.

Evaluation of apically extruded debris following glide-path preparation with different file systems.

Nayak G, Pradeep P, Pai A, Singh N, Banerjee A, Vartak C Bioinformation. 2024; 20(6):683-689.

PMID: 39131523 PMC: 11312319. DOI: 10.6026/973206300200683.

Assessment of Various Reciprocating System in the Extrusion of Debris from Curved Root Canals: An Original Study.

Sharanpriya , Pushpa S, Karuna , Agarwal I, Deshmukh V, Maria R J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023; 15(Suppl 1):S146-S150.

PMID: 37654408 PMC: 10466559. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_441_22.

Incidence of postoperative pain after using single continuous, single reciprocating, and full sequence continuous rotary file system: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Kumar U, Parmar P, Vashisht R, Tandon N, Kaur C J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023; 23(2):91-99.

PMID: 37034837 PMC: 10079766. DOI: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.2.91.

Assessment of postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatment using rotary and reciprocating file systems: an study.

Shaik R, Chukka R, Bandlapally A, Vemuri S, Bolla N, Basam R J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022; 22(4):267-275.

PMID: 35991361 PMC: 9358273. DOI: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.4.267.

References

Ferraz C, Gomes N, Gomes B, Zaia A, Teixeira F, Souza-Filho F . Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J. 2001; 34(5):354-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00394.x. View

Tasdemir T, Er K, Celik D, Yildirim T . Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation on apical extrusion of irrigating solution. Eur J Dent. 2009; 2(3):198-203. PMC: 2635903. View

Ustun Y, Canakci B, Dincer A, Er O, Duzgun S . Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several Ni-Ti systems. Int Endod J. 2014; 48(7):701-4. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12369. View

Lu Y, Wang R, Zhang L, Li H, Zheng Q, Zhou X . Apically extruded debris and irrigant with two Ni-Ti systems and hand files when removing root fillings: a laboratory study. Int Endod J. 2013; 46(12):1125-30. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12104. View

Myers G, Montgomery S . A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod. 1991; 17(6):275-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81866-2. View

Karatas E, Ersoy I, Gunduz H, Uygun A, Kol E, Cakici F . Influence of Instruments Used in Root Canal Preparation on Amount of Apically Extruded Debris. Artif Organs. 2016; 40(8):774-7. DOI: 10.1111/aor.12675. View

De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva E, Mendonca T, Lourenco C, Calixto C . Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 19(2):357-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1267-5. View

Al-Omari M, Dummer P . Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod. 1995; 21(3):154-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80443-7. View

Capar I, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H . An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(10):1638-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.004. View

10.

Karatas E, Arslan H, Kirici D, Alsancak M, Capar I . Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with Twisted File Adaptive instruments in straight root canals: reciprocation with different angles, adaptive motion and continuous rotation. Int Endod J. 2015; 49(4):382-5. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12461. View

11.

Burklein S, Schafer E . Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2012; 38(6):850-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.017. View

12.

Seltzer S, Naidorf I . Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985; 11(11):472-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80220-X. View

13.

De-Deus G, Brandao M, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel R, Luna A . Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110(3):390-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.020. View

14.

Vande Visse J, Brilliant J . Effect of irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation. J Endod. 1975; 1(7):243-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(75)80227-5. View

15.

Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande N . The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2013; 4(1):152-5. PMC: 3671808. DOI: 10.11138/ads.0152. View

16.

Ruddle C, Machtou P, West J . The shaping movement: fifth-generation technology. Dent Today. 2013; 32(4):94, 96-9. View

17.

Kustarci A, Akdemir N, Herguner Siso S, Altunbas D . Apical extrusion of intracanal debris using two engine driven and step-back instrumentation techniques: an in-vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2009; 2(4):233-9. PMC: 2634776. View

18.

Kirchhoff A, Fariniuk L, Mello I . Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2014; 41(2):237-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.023. View

19.

Burklein S, Benten S, Schafer E . Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J. 2013; 47(5):405-9. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12161. View

20.

Burklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schafer E . Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2011; 45(5):449-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x. View