» Articles » PMID: 29386007

Cost-effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment at an Ambulatory Geriatric Unit Based on the AGe-FIT Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2018 Feb 2
PMID 29386007
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Older people with multi-morbidity are increasingly challenging for today's healthcare, and novel, cost-effective healthcare solutions are needed. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) at an ambulatory geriatric unit for people ≥75 years with multi-morbidity.

Method: The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of a CGA strategy with usual care in a Swedish setting. Outcomes were estimated over a lifelong time horizon using decision-analytic modelling based on data from the randomized AGe-FIT trial. The analysis employed a public health care sector perspective. Costs and QALYs were discounted by 3% per annum and are reported in 2016 euros.

Results: Compared with usual care CGA was associated with a per patient mean incremental cost of approximately 25,000 EUR and a gain of 0.54 QALYs resulting in an ICER of 46,000 EUR. The incremental costs were primarily caused by intervention costs and costs associated with increased survival, whereas the gain in QALYs was primarily a consequence of the fact that patients in the CGA group lived longer.

Conclusion: CGA in an ambulatory setting for older people with multi-morbidity results in a cost per QALY of 46,000 EUR compared with usual care, a figure generally considered reasonable in a Swedish healthcare context. A rather simple reorganisation of care for older people with multi-morbidity may therefore cost effectively contribute to meet the needs of this complex patient population.

Trial Registration: The trial was retrospectively registered in clinicaltrial.gov, NCT01446757 . September, 2011.

Citing Articles

Building a pan-European network to bridge gaps in geriatric medicine education: the PROGRAMMING COST Action 21,122-a call for endorsement.

Duque S, Piotrowicz K, Masud T, Wissendorff Ekdahl A, Herghelegiu A, Pavic T Eur Geriatr Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39971850 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-024-01137-0.


Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Fear of Dependency Scale Into European Portuguese.

Pires P, Carvalho J, Pires T, Pires C, Ribeiro O West J Nurs Res. 2024; 46(9):700-707.

PMID: 39161290 PMC: 11380360. DOI: 10.1177/01939459241273400.


Application, knowledge and training needs regarding comprehensive geriatric assessment among geriatric practitioners in healthcare institutions: a cross-sectional study.

Shen S, Zeng X, Hui X, Chen L, Zhang J, Chen X BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):349.

PMID: 38637724 PMC: 11025239. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04964-9.


Global frailty screening tools: Review and application of frailty screening tools from 2001 to 2023.

Deng Y, Sato N Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2024; 13(1):1-11.

PMID: 38404737 PMC: 10883846. DOI: 10.5582/irdr.2023.01113.


Silver Clinic: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment for people living with HIV and frailty.

Clair-Sullivan N, Bristowe K, Adler Z, Bremner S, Harding R, Levett T BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e070590.

PMID: 37208140 PMC: 10201220. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070590.


References
1.
Claxton K, Sculpher M, McCabe C, Briggs A, Akehurst R, Buxton M . Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra. Health Econ. 2005; 14(4):339-47. DOI: 10.1002/hec.985. View

2.
Ekdahl A, Alwin J, Eckerblad J, Husberg M, Jaarsma T, Mazya A . Long-Term Evaluation of the Ambulatory Geriatric Assessment: A Frailty Intervention Trial (AGe-FIT): Clinical Outcomes and Total Costs After 36 Months. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016; 17(3):263-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.008. View

3.
Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F . Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2002; 10(7):621-35. DOI: 10.1023/a:1013171831202. View

4.
Claxton K, Sculpher M, Drummond M . A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE). Lancet. 2002; 360(9334):711-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09832-X. View

5.
Tanajewski L, Franklin M, Gkountouras G, Berdunov V, Edmans J, Conroy S . Cost-Effectiveness of a Specialist Geriatric Medical Intervention for Frail Older People Discharged from Acute Medical Units: Economic Evaluation in a Two-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial (AMIGOS). PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0121340. PMC: 4420253. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121340. View