» Articles » PMID: 29385898

Evaluation of Ureteral Lesions in Ureterorenoscopy: Impact of Access Sheath Use

Overview
Journal Scand J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2018 Feb 2
PMID 29385898
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of ureteral lesions in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with and without the use of a 10/12 Fr ureteral access sheath (UAS). A further objective was to search for preoperative factors that could influence the risk of ureteral damage.

Materials And Methods: Data were collected from a clinical database on 180 consecutive adult patients undergoing RIRS for kidney stones with or without a 10/12 Fr UAS. The primary outcome measure was ureteral lesions endoscopically identified at the end of surgery using the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) classification system.

Results: The use of 10/12 Fr UASs resulted in less severe lesions than reported previously with larger diameter UASs. There was a higher risk of superficial lesions in the UAS group, with a calculated crude odds ratio (OR) of 1.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-3.37]. When adjusting for age and gender, the OR was 1.68 (95% CI 0.90-3.13; p = 0.10) and thus was not significant. The only factor that remained significant was age (OR =1.02/year, 95% CI 1.00-1.04).

Conclusion: There was a trend towards a higher risk of ureteral lesions in RIRS with a 10/12 Fr UAS compared with an endoscope alone, but when adjusting for age and gender the incidence of ureteral lesions was comparable between RIRS with and without the use of a 10/12 Fr UAS.

Citing Articles

Ureteral access sheath or percutaneous nephrostomy during flexible ureteroscopy: which is better?.

Alhefnawy M, Abdelrahman M, Abo-Elnasr H, Eldib H Urolithiasis. 2025; 53(1):18.

PMID: 39751955 PMC: 11698769. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01683-z.


Optimal deflection techniques for flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS): a comparative in vitro PEARLS analysis.

Lua A, Tan L, Panthier F, Sierra A, Ventimiglia E, Solano C World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):606.

PMID: 39476254 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05297-3.


Utilization of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lin C, Chuang S, Shih H, Pan Y Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(7.

PMID: 39064513 PMC: 11278831. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071084.


Ureteral access sheath. Does it improve the results of flexible ureteroscopy? A narrative review.

Santa Cruz J, Danilovic A, Vicentini F, Brito A, Batagello C, Marchini G Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50(3):346-358.

PMID: 38498688 PMC: 11152322. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9907.


Ureteral Access Sheaths and Its Use in the Future: A Comprehensive Update Based on a Literature Review.

De Coninck V, Somani B, Tarik Sener E, Emiliani E, Corrales M, Juliebo-Jones P J Clin Med. 2022; 11(17).

PMID: 36079058 PMC: 9456781. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175128.