» Articles » PMID: 29385812

Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: The Impact of Sheath Size on Intrarenal Pelvic Pressure and Infectious Complications in a Porcine Model

Overview
Journal J Endourol
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2018 Feb 2
PMID 29385812
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine how sheath and endoscope size affect intrarenal pelvic pressures and risk of postoperative infectious complications comparing "Mini" vs "Standard" percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials And Methods: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli were grown and 10 of them were instilled into the porcine renal pelvis through retrograde access for 1 hour. Percutaneous access utilized a 14/16F 20 cm ureteral access sheath for the Mini arm and a 30F sheath for the Standard arm. Nephroscopy was simulated utilizing either an 8/9.8F semirigid ureteroscope or 26F nephroscope for 1 hour while intrarenal pelvic pressure was continuously monitored. Blood and tissue cultures of kidney, liver, and spleen biopsies were plated and incubated and positive cultures were confirmed with polymerase chain reaction.

Results: Intrapelvic pressures were higher in the Mini group, 18.76 ± 5.82 mm Hg vs 13.56 ± 5.82 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). Time spent above 30 mm Hg was greater in the Mini arm, 117.0 seconds vs 66.1 seconds (p = 0.0452). All pigs had positive kidney tissue cultures whereas spleen cultures were positive in 100% and 60% of pigs in the Mini and Standard arms, respectively (p = 0.0253); 90% and 30% had positive liver tissue culture in the Mini and Standard arms, respectively (p = 0.0062). Blood cultures were positive in 30% of pigs in the Mini arm compared with none in the Standard arm (p = 0.0603).

Conclusion: Mini-PCNL was associated with higher intrarenal pressures and higher risk of end organ bacterial seeding in the setting of an infected collecting system. This suggests a higher potential for infectious complications in a clinical setting.

Citing Articles

No ureteral catheter mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (NUC-mPCNL) achieves enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Li X, Tan Z, Yu Y, Zhou X, Xi H, Liu W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27129.

PMID: 39511228 PMC: 11544222. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75625-5.


Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery and multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for octopus stone: A propensity score-matching study.

Cui D, Chen G, Luo J, Ma Q, Wang G, Yang Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(22):e38311.

PMID: 39259108 PMC: 11142782. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038311.


Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with lower rates of infectious complications compared to vacuum-cleaner procedure in patients at high risk for infections: a single-center experience.

Marmiroli A, Nizzardo M, Zanetti S, Lucignani G, Turetti M, Silvani C World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):200.

PMID: 38536503 PMC: 10973077. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04897-3.


Miniaturizing the approach to upper tract renal calculi: Is smaller always better? A narrative review.

Da Silva Ferreira D, Bhattu A, Adam A Curr Urol. 2023; 17(4):280-285.

PMID: 37994342 PMC: 10662827. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000210.


Kidney stone management in the era of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does it improve safety? a prospective cohort study.

Sakly A, Zakhama W, Jleli N, Chafik A, Binous Y Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023; 85(5):1502-1506.

PMID: 37228967 PMC: 10205326. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000576.