Comparative Genotoxicity of TEMPO and 3 of Its Derivatives in Mouse Lymphoma Cells
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
TEMPO (2, 2, 6, 6-tetramethylphiperidine-1-oxyl) and its derivatives are stable free radical nitroxides widely used in the field of chemistry, biology, and pharmacology. TEMPO was previously found to be mutagenic and to induce micronuclei in mammalian cells. In this study, we investigated and quantified the genotoxicity of 4 structurally similar nitroxides, TEMPO and 3 of its derivatives (4-hydroxy-TEMPO, 4-oxo-TEMPO, and 4-methoxy-TEMPO), using the mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) and Comet assay in L5178Y Tk+/- cells. The results showed that all tested nitroxides were cytotoxic and mutagenic in the MLA, both in the presence and absence of S9, with metabolic activation significantly enhancing the cytotoxicity and/or mutagenicity. In addition, the 4 nitroxides caused DNA-strand breakage. The mutagenicity and DNA damaging dose-responses of the test articles were compared using the PROAST benchmark dose software package. The potency ranking of the 4 nitroxides for mutagenicity was different from the ranking of the DNA damaging effects. The mode of action analysis by a multi-endpoint DNA damage pathway assay classified all 4 nitroxides as clastogens. In addition, the majority of the induced Tk mutants showed loss of heterozygosity at the Tk and D11Mit42 loci (ie, chromosome damage <31 Mbp). These results suggest that TEMPO and its 3 derivatives are cytotoxic and mutagenic in mouse lymphoma cells through a mechanism that involves strand breakage and large alterations to DNA. The potency rankings indicate that the different TEMPO derivatives vary in their mutagenic and DNA damaging potential.
Membrane Partitioning of TEMPO Discriminates Human Lung Cancer from Neighboring Normal Cells.
Gasymov O, Bakhishova M, Aslanov R, Melikova L, Aliyev J Acta Naturae. 2024; 15(4):111-120.
PMID: 38234602 PMC: 10790361. DOI: 10.32607/actanaturae.19426.
Effect of Low Concentration of Nitroxides on SH-SY5Y Cells Transfected with the Tau Protein.
Bartosz G, Pienkowska N, Kut K, Cieniek B, Stefaniuk I, Sadowska-Bartosz I Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(23).
PMID: 38069000 PMC: 10706669. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316675.
Falandt M, Bernal P, Dudaryeva O, Florczak S, Grofibacher G, Schweiger M Adv Mater Technol. 2023; 8(15).
PMID: 37811162 PMC: 7615165. DOI: 10.1002/admt.202300026.
Optimized Photoclick (Bio)Resins for Fast Volumetric Bioprinting.
Rizzo R, Ruetsche D, Liu H, Zenobi-Wong M Adv Mater. 2021; 33(49):e2102900.
PMID: 34611928 PMC: 11468798. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202102900.
Comparative potency analysis of whole smoke solutions in the bacterial reverse mutation test.
Meng F, Mei N, Yan J, Guo X, Richter P, Chen T Mutagenesis. 2021; 36(4):321-329.
PMID: 34131742 PMC: 8742878. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geab021.