Importance:
Understanding how diabetes and hypertension prevalence varies within a country as large as India is essential for targeting of prevention, screening, and treatment services. However, to our knowledge there has been no prior nationally representative study of these conditions to guide the design of effective policies.
Objective:
To determine the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension in India, and its variation by state, rural vs urban location, and individual-level sociodemographic characteristics.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This was a cross-sectional, nationally representative, population-based study carried out between 2012 and 2014. A total of 1 320 555 adults 18 years or older with plasma glucose (PG) and blood pressure (BP) measurements were included in the analysis.
Exposures:
State, rural vs urban location, age, sex, household wealth quintile, education, and marital status.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Diabetes (PG level ≥126 mg/dL if the participant had fasted or ≥200 mg/dL if the participant had not fasted) and hypertension (systolic BP≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP≥90 mm Hg).
Results:
Of the 1 320 555 adults, 701 408 (53.1%) were women. The crude prevalence of diabetes and hypertension was 7.5% (95% CI, 7.3%-7.7%) and 25.3% (95% CI, 25.0%-25.6%), respectively. Notably, hypertension was common even among younger age groups (eg, 18-25 years: 12.1%; 95% CI, 11.8%-12.5%). Being in the richest household wealth quintile compared with being in the poorest quintile was associated with only a modestly higher probability of diabetes (rural: 2.81 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.53-3.08 and urban: 3.47 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.03-3.91) and hypertension (rural: 4.15 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.68-4.61 and urban: 3.01 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.38-3.65). The differences in the probability of both conditions by educational category were generally small (≤2 percentage points). Among states, the crude prevalence of diabetes and hypertension varied from 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7%-3.7%) to 19.9% (95% CI, 17.6%-22.3%), and 18.0% (95% CI, 16.6%-19.5%) to 41.6% (95% CI, 37.8%-45.5%), respectively.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Diabetes and hypertension prevalence is high in middle and old age across all geographical areas and sociodemographic groups in India, and hypertension prevalence among young adults is higher than previously thought. Evidence on the variations in prevalence by state, age group, and rural vs urban location is critical to effectively target diabetes and hypertension prevention, screening, and treatment programs to those most in need.
Citing Articles
Care cascades of diabetes and hypertension among late adolescents in India.
Malik B, Goyal A, Maiti S, Mohanty S
J Glob Health. 2025; 15:04101.
PMID: 40048318
PMC: 11884645.
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.15.04101.
Assessing type-2 diabetes risk based on the Indian diabetes risk score among adults aged 45 and above in India.
Maniyara K, Kodali P
Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4495.
PMID: 39915651
PMC: 11802721.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88460-z.
Managing high disease burden: a study of medication rationality in diabetes and hypertension in Andhra Pradesh.
Dasari N, Ahmed N, Panda S, Kumari A, Lakshmi T, Vemana H
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024; 23(2):2123-2129.
PMID: 39610551
PMC: 11599496.
DOI: 10.1007/s40200-024-01475-7.
Walking a tightrope: perspectives of non-degree allopathic providers (NDAPs) on providing diabetes and hypertension care in urban informal settlements of Mumbai Metropolitan Region.
Bahuguna M, Spencer J, Ramani S, Pathak S, Shende S, Pantvaidya S
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1452.
PMID: 39578800
PMC: 11583575.
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11919-8.
Pharmacovigilance monitoring and treatment adherence in patients on antihypertensive drugs at a tertiary care centre.
Agrawal P, Patrick S, Thomas M, Gupta D, Singh Matreja P, Singh P
Drugs Context. 2024; 13.
PMID: 39469027
PMC: 11514578.
DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-5-2.
Effectiveness of Home-Based Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in a Primary Care set-up of India (EASE-BP): Protocol for an Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bhatia R, Haldar P, Longkumer I, Srivastava M, Misra P, Sharma G
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2024; 27(5):562-568.
PMID: 39428918
PMC: 11575861.
DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_471_24.
Spousal age difference and risk of hypertension in women: evidence from India.
Datta B, Tiwari A, Jahan M, Torres N, Attari S
J Hum Hypertens. 2024; 38(12):851-859.
PMID: 39306643
DOI: 10.1038/s41371-024-00959-6.
Health disparity at the intersection of religion and caste: Evidence from India.
Datta B, Thakkar S
Dialogues Health. 2024; 5:100186.
PMID: 39184573
PMC: 11344008.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100186.
Assessment of Medication Adherence Among Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus in a Tertiary Healthcare Center: A Descriptive Study.
Govindani R, Sharma A, Patel N, Baradia P, Agrawal A
Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63126.
PMID: 39055471
PMC: 11271814.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63126.
Correlates of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in India: Change as evidenced from NFHS- 4 and 5 during 2015-2021.
Rana R, Jha R, Sinha R, Kumar D, Jaiswal R, Patel U
PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305223.
PMID: 39024279
PMC: 11257250.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305223.
Prevalence, Outcomes, and Predictors of Prolonged Corrected QT Interval in Hydroxychloroquine-Naïve Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.
Gupta P, Gupta A, Gupta K, Bansal S, Sharma M, Balakrishnan I
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2024; 24(10):1053-1066.
PMID: 38954228
DOI: 10.1007/s12012-024-09886-x.
The Association Between Depressive Symptoms, Access to Diabetes Care, and Glycemic Control in Five Middle-Income Countries.
Merkel L, Teufel F, Malta D, Theilmann M, Marcus M, Flood D
Diabetes Care. 2024; 47(8):1449-1456.
PMID: 38917276
PMC: 11272970.
DOI: 10.2337/dc23-1507.
A Bayesian network for estimating hypertension risk due to occupational aluminum exposure.
Zhao L, Yin J, Huan J, Han X, Zhao D, Song J
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2024; 10(2):130-139.
PMID: 38872757
PMC: 11166680.
DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.134.
Preparedness of diabetic patients for receiving telemedical health care: A cross-sectional study.
Kumar P, Puri O, Unnithan V, Reddy A, Aswath S, Pathania M
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(3):1004-1011.
PMID: 38736819
PMC: 11086785.
DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1024_23.
An assessment of treatment compliance using the Morisky scale-8 tool in adult hypertensive patients of Eastern India.
Kishor R, Kumari S, Prakash R, Chaudhary N, Shyama S, Ahmad S
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(3):924-931.
PMID: 38736807
PMC: 11086791.
DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1416_23.
Pestilent relationship between smoking and hypertension or pulse pressure among males over 15 years in India: NFHS-5 Survey.
Lal D, Virk A, Bhardwaj A, Kapoor Lal K, Bora J, Nadda A
PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0294898.
PMID: 38701092
PMC: 11068163.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294898.
Predictors for Concurrent Diabetes in Tuberculosis Patients. Perspectives from Two Mining Districts of Eastern Tribal State Jharkhand, in India.
Rai S, Jha R, Prasad S, Kumar D, Rana R
Indian J Community Med. 2024; 49(2):404-410.
PMID: 38665445
PMC: 11042151.
DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_11_23.
A Retrospective Analysis of Clinicopathological Features in 117 Isolated Maxillary Sinus Pathologies in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Lambor S, Varughese K, Naik A, Lambor D, Tiwari M, De Sa C
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(2):1931-1940.
PMID: 38566682
PMC: 10982275.
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04446-1.
District-Wise Heterogeneity in Blood Pressure Measurements, Prehypertension, Raised Blood Pressure, and Their Determinants Among Indians: National Family Health Survey-5.
Seenappa K, Kulothungan V, Mohan R, Mathur P
Int J Public Health. 2024; 69:1606766.
PMID: 38562553
PMC: 10982880.
DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606766.
Caregiver Burden and Stress in Caregivers of Stroke Survivors: Relevant but Neglected.
Baishya J
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2024; 27(1):7-8.
PMID: 38495253
PMC: 10941910.
DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_390_23.