The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring During Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2018 Jan 30

PMID 29375947

Citations 5

Authors

Tarik Ibrahim

Oliver Mrowczynski

Omar Zalatimo

Vernon Chinchilli

Jonas Sheehan

Robert Harbaugh

Elias Rizk

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Neuromonitoring has been utilized during spinal surgery to assess the function of the spinal cord in an effort to prevent intraoperative injury. Although its use is widespread, no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Our goal in this study was to interrogate the value of intraoperative neuromonitoring in decreasing the severity and rate of neurological injury during and after spinal surgery. Here we describe our experience of 121 patients who underwent spinal cord procedures with the combination of intraoperative neuromonitoring, to determine its ability to detect neurological changes and the specificity and sensitivity in this setting. The data for the 121 patients who underwent neurophysiological monitoring during various spinal procedures was collected retrospectively. The patients were classified into one of four groups according to the findings of intraoperative monitoring and the clinical outcomes on postoperative neurological exam. Intraoperative monitoring was evaluated for its specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value. In our cohort of 121 patients, the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring had a low sensitivity, which may produce an excessive number of false negatives. Based on these findings, neuromonitoring seems to have a poor positive predictive value and is thus an inappropriate test to prevent harm to patients.

Citing Articles

Cervical fracture dislocation without neurological abnormality: Rare case reports.

Japamadisaw A, Hidayat A Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 120:109814.

PMID: 38851073 PMC: 11220514. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109814.

Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Cranial and Spinal Tumour Surgeries: A Descriptive Observational Study.

Gupta S, Siddiqui S, Sinha U, Gupta G Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e49411.

PMID: 38149147 PMC: 10750011. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49411.

New frontiers in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: a narrative review.

Oliva A, Montejano J, Simmons C, Vogel S, Isaza C, Clavijo C Ann Transl Med. 2023; 11(11):388.

PMID: 37970609 PMC: 10632568. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-4586.

The Role of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Modalities in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

Chandra A, Vaishnav A, Shahi P, Song J, Mok J, Alluri R HSS J. 2023; 19(1):53-61.

PMID: 36776519 PMC: 9837402. DOI: 10.1177/15563316221110572.

Neuromonitoring in Cervical Spine Surgery: When Is a Signal Drop Clinically Significant?.

Decruz J, Kaliya-Perumal A, Wong K, Shree Kumar D, Yang E, Oh J Asian Spine J. 2020; 15(3):317-323.

PMID: 33260284 PMC: 8217856. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0074.

References

Pelosi L, Jardine A, Webb J . Neurological complications of anterior spinal surgery for kyphosis with normal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999; 66(5):662-4. PMC: 1736350. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.66.5.662. View

Jones S, Buonamassa S, Crockard H . Two cases of quadriparesis following anterior cervical discectomy, with normal perioperative somatosensory evoked potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003; 74(2):273-6. PMC: 1738296. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.74.2.273. View

Kearse Jr L, Brown E, McPeck K . Somatosensory evoked potentials sensitivity relative to electroencephalography for cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1992; 23(4):498-505. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.23.4.498. View

Friedman W, Kaplan B, Day A, Sypert G, Curran M . Evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm operation: observations after fifty cases. Neurosurgery. 1987; 20(5):678-87. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198705000-00002. View

Kothbauer K, Deletis V, Epstein F . Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures. Neurosurg Focus. 2006; 4(5):e1. DOI: 10.3171/foc.1998.4.5.4. View

Vitale M, Skaggs D, Pace G, Wright M, Matsumoto H, Anderson R . Best Practices in Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spine Deformity Surgery: Development of an Intraoperative Checklist to Optimize Response. Spine Deform. 2016; 2(5):333-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.05.003. View

Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, Sandalcioglu I, Schafer H, Stolke D . The impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring on surgical decisions: a critical analysis of 423 cases. J Neurosurg. 2002; 96(2):255-62. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.2.0255. View

Dawson E, Sherman J, Kanim L, Nuwer M . Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; 16(8 Suppl):S361-4. View

Sebastian C, RAYA J, Ortega M, Olalla E, Lemos V, Romero R . Intraoperative control by somatosensory evoked potentials in the treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathy. Results in 210 cases. Eur Spine J. 1997; 6(5):316-23. PMC: 3454606. DOI: 10.1007/BF01142677. View

10.

Nash Jr C, Lorig R, Schatzinger L, Brown R . Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977; (126):100-5. View

11.

Sala F, Dvorak J, Faccioli F . Cost effectiveness of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16 Suppl 2:S229-31. PMC: 2072899. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0420-0. View

12.

Lesser R, Raudzens P, Luders H, Nuwer M, Goldie W, Morris 3rd H . Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol. 1986; 19(1):22-5. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410190105. View

13.

Kartush J . Electroneurography and intraoperative facial monitoring in contemporary neurotology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989; 101(4):496-503. DOI: 10.1177/019459988910100416. View

14.

Vitale M, Moore D, Matsumoto H, Emerson R, Booker W, Gomez J . Risk factors for spinal cord injury during surgery for spinal deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(1):64-71. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01839. View

15.

Forbes H, Allen P, Waller C, Jones S, Edgar M, Webb P . Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Experience with 1168 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(3):487-91. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B3.1670455. View

16.

Scibilia A, Terranova C, Rizzo V, Raffa G, Morelli A, Esposito F . Intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring in spinal tumor surgery: sirens or indispensable tools?. Neurosurg Focus. 2016; 41(2):E18. DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16141. View

17.

Devlin V, Schwartz D . Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007; 15(9):549-60. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200709000-00005. View

18.

Acharya S, Palukuri N, Gupta P, Kohli M . Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials during Spinal Deformity Corrections-Safety, Efficacy, Limitations, and the Role of a Checklist. Front Surg. 2017; 4:8. PMC: 5303707. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00008. View

19.

Schwartz D, Auerbach J, Dormans J, Flynn J, Bowe J, Laufer S . Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(11):2440-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01476. View

20.

Minahan R, Sepkuty J, Lesser R, Sponseller P, Kostuik J . Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic 'motor' evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(8):1442-50. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00567-3. View