» Articles » PMID: 29367318

Interactive Visualisation for Interpreting Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study Results

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Jan 26
PMID 29367318
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Information about the performance of diagnostic tests is typically presented in the form of measures of test accuracy such as sensitivity and specificity. These measures may be difficult to translate directly into decisions about patient treatment, for which information presented in the form of probabilities of disease after a positive or a negative test result may be more useful. These probabilities depend on the prevalence of the disease, which is likely to vary between populations. This article aims to clarify the relationship between pre-test (prevalence) and post-test probabilities of disease, and presents two free, online interactive tools to illustrate this relationship. These tools allow probabilities of disease to be compared with decision thresholds above and below which different treatment decisions may be indicated. They are intended to help those involved in communicating information about diagnostic test performance and are likely to be of benefit when teaching these concepts. A substantive example is presented using C reactive protein as a diagnostic marker for bacterial infection in the older adult population. The tools may also be useful for manufacturers of clinical tests in planning product development, for authors of test evaluation studies to improve reporting and for users of test evaluations to facilitate interpretation and application of the results.

Citing Articles

Context matters: the evolving use of biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease care.

Fortea J EBioMedicine. 2024; 108:105387.

PMID: 39366842 PMC: 11663746. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105387.


The accuracy of prehospital triage decisions in English trauma networks - a case-cohort study.

Fuller G, Baird J, Keating S, Miller J, Pilbery R, Kean N Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024; 32(1):47.

PMID: 38773613 PMC: 11110388. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-024-01219-9.


Development of a risk prediction model for bloodstream infection in patients with fever of unknown origin.

Xu T, Wu S, Li J, Wang L, Huang H J Transl Med. 2022; 20(1):575.

PMID: 36482449 PMC: 9733314. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03796-8.


COVID-19 testing in English care homes and implications for staff and residents.

Micocci M, Gordon A, Allen A, Hicks T, Kierkegaard P, McLister A Age Ageing. 2021; 50(3):668-672.

PMID: 33481986 PMC: 7929459. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab015.


How to Ease the Pain of Taking a Diagnostic Point of Care Test to the Market: A Framework for Evidence Development.

Graziadio S, Winter A, Lendrem B, Suklan J, Jones W, Urwin S Micromachines (Basel). 2020; 11(3).

PMID: 32164393 PMC: 7142698. DOI: 10.3390/mi11030291.


References
1.
Reid M, Lane D, Feinstein A . Academic calculations versus clinical judgments: practicing physicians' use of quantitative measures of test accuracy. Am J Med. 1998; 104(4):374-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00054-0. View

2.
Grimes D, Schulz K . Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005; 365(9469):1500-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66422-7. View

3.
Puhan M, Steurer J, Bachmann L, Ter Riet G . A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143(3):184-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00004. View

4.
Stucker F, Herrmann F, Graf J, Michel J, Krause K, Gavazzi G . Procalcitonin and infection in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53(8):1392-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53421.x. View

5.
Vickers A, Elkin E . Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(6):565-74. PMC: 2577036. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295361. View