» Articles » PMID: 29358265

Experiences of Practice Facilitators Working on the Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care Project: Retrospective Case Study

Overview
Date 2018 Jan 24
PMID 29358265
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the barriers to and facilitators of practice facilitation experienced by participants in the Improving Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC) project.

Design: Case studies of practice facilitators' narrative reports.

Setting: Eastern Ontario.

Participants: Primary care practices that participated in the IDOCC project.

Main Outcome Measures: Cases were identified by calculating sum scores in order to determine practices' performance relative to their peers. Two case exemplars were selected that scored within ± 1 SD of the total mean score, and a qualitative analysis of practice facilitators' narrative reports was conducted using a 5-factor implementation framework to identify barriers and facilitators. Narratives were divided into 3 phases: planning, implementation, and sustainability.

Results: Barriers and facilitators fluctuated over the intervention's 3 phases. Site A reported more barriers (n = 47) than facilitators (n = 38), while site B reported a roughly equal number of barriers (n = 144) and facilitators (n = 136). In both sites, the most common barriers involved organizational and provider factors and the most common facilitators were associated with innovation and structural factors.

Conclusion: Both practices encountered various barriers and facilitators throughout the IDOCC's 3 phases. The case studies reveal the complex interactions of these factors over time, and provide insight into the implementation of practice facilitation programs.

Citing Articles

Attributes of High-Performing Small Practices in a Guideline Implementation: A Multiple-Case Study.

Nguyen A, Cuthel A, Rogers E, Devanter N, Pham-Singer H, Shih S J Prim Care Community Health. 2020; 11:2150132720984411.

PMID: 33356790 PMC: 7768565. DOI: 10.1177/2150132720984411.

References
1.
Colquhoun H, Leeman J, Michie S, Lokker C, Bragge P, Hempel S . Towards a common terminology: a simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:51. PMC: 4021969. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-51. View

2.
Kottke T, Solberg L, Brekke M, Conn S, Maxwell P, Brekke M . A controlled trial to integrate smoking cessation advice into primary care practice: Doctors Helping Smokers, Round III. J Fam Pract. 1992; 34(6):701-8. View

3.
Foy R, Ovretveit J, Shekelle P, Pronovost P, Taylor S, Dy S . The role of theory in research to develop and evaluate the implementation of patient safety practices. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 20(5):453-9. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047993. View

4.
Feldstein A, Glasgow R . A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008; 34(4):228-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34030-6. View

5.
Nagykaldi Z, Mold J, Aspy C . Practice facilitators: a review of the literature. Fam Med. 2005; 37(8):581-8. View