Neuropsychological Outcome One Year After Carotid Revascularization: A Before-and-after Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: The aim of our study was to determine the clinical profile of patients considered cognitive 'responders' to surgery in order to establish clinical variables associated with a favorable cognitive performance.
Materials And Methods: A total of 70 patients were included in the study. A well-validated, comprehensive standardized neurocognitive battery of tests of about 2 hours was administered. Patients were examined twice, 1-week before surgery and 1-year postoperatively. The criterion to be included in the 'responder' group was the following: to obtain a positive difference between post-revascularization and pre-revascularization neuropsychological assessment ≥1 standard deviation in ≥2 tests.
Results: Twenty-seven patients (38.6%) were cognitive responders to treatment. In bivariate analysis between responders and non-responders, presence of atrophy (P=0.003), small vessels (P=0.577), symptoms (P=0.046), and age (P=0.030) were the factors statistically significant. When comparing cognitive performance before and after carotid revascularization, significant differences were observed in semantic fluency with a lower performance after 12 months (P=0.004, d=0.29), and in the Language index (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) (P=0.005, d=0.34).
Conclusion: Patients without neurological symptoms, of a younger age and without atrophy and white matter small vessel lesions are better cognitive responders 1-year after carotid revascularization.
Varga A, Peter C, Vecsey-Nagy M, Gyebnar G, Borzsak S, Szilveszter B Neuroradiology. 2025; .
PMID: 39821632 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03527-4.
Nakamizo A, Amano T, Kuwashiro T, Yasaka M, Okada Y Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):17855.
PMID: 31780807 PMC: 6883058. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54459-6.
Hara S, Seida M, Kumagai K, Yamamoto T Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019; 60(2):66-74.
PMID: 31748442 PMC: 7040432. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0147.