Constraints on Tone Sensitivity in Novel Word Learning by Monolingual and Bilingual Infants: Tone Properties Are More Influential Than Tone Familiarity

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2018 Jan 23

PMID 29354077

Citations 7

Authors

Denis Burnham

Leher Singh

Karen Mattock

Pei J Woo

Marina Kalashnikova

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study compared tone sensitivity in monolingual and bilingual infants in a novel word learning task. Tone language learning infants (Experiment 1, Mandarin monolingual; Experiment 2, Mandarin-English bilingual) were tested with Mandarin (native) or Thai (non-native) lexical tone pairs which contrasted static vs. dynamic (high vs. rising) tones or dynamic vs. dynamic (rising vs. falling) tones. Non-tone language, English-learning infants (Experiment 3) were tested on English intonational contrasts or the Mandarin or Thai tone contrasts. Monolingual Mandarin language infants were able to bind tones to novel words for the Mandarin High-Rising contrast, but not for the Mandarin Rising-Falling contrast; and they were insensitive to both the High-Rising and the Rising-Falling tone contrasts in Thai. Bilingual English-Mandarin infants were similar to the Mandarin monolinguals in that they were sensitive to the Mandarin High-Rising contrast and not to the Mandarin Rising-Falling contrast. However, unlike the Mandarin monolinguals, they were also sensitive to the High Rising contrast in Thai. Monolingual English learning infants were insensitive to all three types of contrasts (Mandarin, Thai, English), although they did respond differentially to tone-bearing vs. intonation-marked words. Findings suggest that infants' sensitivity to tones in word learning contexts depends heavily on tone properties, and that this influence is, in some cases, stronger than effects of language familiarity. Moreover, bilingual infants demonstrated greater phonological flexibility in tone interpretation.

Citing Articles

Toward characterization of perceptual specialization for faces in Multiracial contexts.

Pickron C, Kutlu E Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1392042.

PMID: 39691664 PMC: 11649437. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392042.

Developmental change in English-learning children's interpretations of salient pitch contours in word learning.

Quam C, Swingley D Infancy. 2024; 29(3):355-385.

PMID: 38421947 PMC: 11018469. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12587.

Protracted Development on Native Tone Interpretation: Evidence From Mandarin-Learning Infants' Novel Word Learning.

Zheng X, Ji Y, Meng X Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1512.

PMID: 31333543 PMC: 6625176. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01512.

The Diversity of Tone Languages and the Roles of Pitch Variation in Non-tone Languages: Considerations for Tone Perception Research.

Best C Front Psychol. 2019; 10:364.

PMID: 30863341 PMC: 6399451. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00364.

How Do Infants Disaggregate Referential and Affective Pitch?.

Kager R Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2093.

PMID: 30429817 PMC: 6220085. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02093.

References

Wong P, Schwartz R, Jenkins J . Perception and production of lexical tones by 3-year-old, Mandarin-speaking children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 48(5):1065-79. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/074). View

Polka L, Werker J . Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(2):421-35. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.421. View

Liu L, Kager R . Bilingual exposure influences infant VOT perception. Infant Behav Dev. 2015; 38:27-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.004. View

Tsao F . Perceptual Improvement of Lexical Tones in Infants: Effects of Tone Language Experience. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:558. PMC: 5387075. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00558. View

Ramachers S, Brouwer S, Fikkert P . No perceptual reorganization for Limburgian tones? A cross-linguistic investigation with 6- to 12-month-old infants. J Child Lang. 2017; 45(2):290-318. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000917000228. View

Hay J, Graf Estes K, Wang T, Saffran J . From flexibility to constraint: the contrastive use of lexical tone in early word learning. Child Dev. 2014; 86(1):10-22. PMC: 4295000. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12269. View

Wong P . Monosyllabic Mandarin tone productions by 3-year-olds growing up in Taiwan and in the United States: interjudge reliability and perceptual results. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012; 55(5):1423-37. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0273). View

EIMAS P, SIQUELAND E, Jusczyk P, Vigorito J . Speech perception in infants. Science. 1971; 171(3968):303-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.171.3968.303. View

Ferjan Ramirez N, Ramirez R, Clarke M, Taulu S, Kuhl P . Speech discrimination in 11-month-old bilingual and monolingual infants: a magnetoencephalography study. Dev Sci. 2016; 20(1). DOI: 10.1111/desc.12427. View

10.

Yeung H, Chen L, Werker J . Referential labeling can facilitate phonetic learning in infancy. Child Dev. 2014; 85(3):1036-49. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12185. View

11.

Singh L, Poh F, Fu C . Limits on Monolingualism? A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Abilities to Integrate Lexical Tone in Novel Word Learning. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:667. PMC: 4861728. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00667. View

12.

Wang Y, SPENCE M, Jongman A, SERENO J . Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 106(6):3649-58. DOI: 10.1121/1.428217. View

13.

Graf Estes K, Hay J . Flexibility in Bilingual Infants' Word Learning. Child Dev. 2015; 86(5):1371-85. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12392. View

14.

Chen A, Stevens C, Kager R . Pitch Perception in the First Year of Life, a Comparison of Lexical Tones and Musical Pitch. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:297. PMC: 5343020. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00297. View

15.

Liu L, Kager R . Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language. Cognition. 2014; 133(2):385-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.004. View

16.

Petitto L, Berens M, Kovelman I, Dubins M, Jasinska K, Shalinsky M . The "Perceptual Wedge Hypothesis" as the basis for bilingual babies' phonetic processing advantage: new insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain Lang. 2011; 121(2):130-43. PMC: 3192234. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.003. View

17.

Wong P . Perceptual evidence for protracted development in monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone production in preschool children in Taiwan. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133(1):434-43. DOI: 10.1121/1.4768883. View

18.

Kuhl P, Conboy B, Coffey-Corina S, Padden D, Rivera-Gaxiola M, Nelson T . Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 363(1493):979-1000. PMC: 2606791. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2154. View

19.

Stager C, Werker J . Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature. 1997; 388(6640):381-2. DOI: 10.1038/41102. View

20.

Singh L . Bilingual Infants Demonstrate Advantages in Learning Words in a Third Language. Child Dev. 2017; 89(4):e397-e413. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12852. View