» Articles » PMID: 29353973

Prognostic Evaluation of Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for Operable Cervical Cancer: 10 Years' Experience of National Cancer Center in China

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jan 23
PMID 29353973
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic factors and to evaluate the impact of adjuvant therapy on clinical outcome for early-stage cervical cancer.

Methods: The clinical-pathological data of all 1,335 patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Ib-IIa cervical cancer treated with primary radical surgery at the Chinese National Cancer Center between May 2007 and Dec 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The median follow-up was 70 months.

Results: Of all the patients, 61.6% of the cases received adjuvant therapy, with 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 92.1% and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95.0%. In multivariate analysis, differentiation of G3 (P<0.05), lymph node metastasis (LNM, P<0.05) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, P<0.05) were independent predictors for OS, while LNM (P<0.05), deep stroma invasion (DSI, P<0.05) and LVSI (P<0.05) were independent factors for DFS. The samples were stratified by histologic type, and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was found to share the same independent factors except for differentiation of OS. As to patients with cervical adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/ASC), differentiation was the independent predictor of OS (P<0.05); and LVSI of DFS (P<0.05). Of 236 patients with high-risk factors, there was no significant difference in survival between concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT, n=195), radiotherapy (RT, n=24), and chemotherapy (CT, n=17). Among the 190 patients with LNM who underwent CCRT, 124 cases showed improved DFS after sequential CT (P=0.118), with a recurrence rate decrease of 14%, though the difference was not statistically significant. Patients with single intermediate-risk factors like DSI or LVSI were found to partially benefit from adjuvant therapy, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: LNM, LVSI, DSI and differentiation were found to be independent prognostic factors for operable cervical cancer. Aggressive postoperative adjuvant therapy based on single risk factors in Chinese National Cancer Center could benefit survival. CCRT+CT outperformed CCRT in high-risk patients. For patients with single non-high-risk factor, the role of adjuvant therapy needs to be further discussed.

Citing Articles

Obesity and recurrent spontaneous abortion: the crucial role of weight management in pregnancy.

Wang R, Deng Z, Chen G, Dai F, Xia L Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):10.

PMID: 39844265 PMC: 11752768. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01326-3.


Lumican is a potential predictor on the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Hu G, Xiao Y, Ma C, Wang J, Qian X, Wu X Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e18011.

PMID: 37483824 PMC: 10362307. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18011.


Cervical cancer prognosis and related risk factors for patients with cervical cancer: a long-term retrospective cohort study.

Li J, Liu G, Luo J, Yan S, Ye P, Wang J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13994.

PMID: 35978078 PMC: 9385852. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17733-8.


Comparison of Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Between Early-Stage Cervical Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Carcinoma Patients After Radical Surgery and Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

Zhou Y, Wang W, Hu K, Zhang F Cancer Manag Res. 2021; 13:7597-7605.

PMID: 34675656 PMC: 8500504. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S329614.


Impact of different therapies on the survival of patients with stage I-IIA cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors.

Nie J, Wu Q, Yan A, Wu Z Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(2):142.

PMID: 33569444 PMC: 7867952. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7679.


References
1.
Takekuma M, Kasamatsu Y, Kado N, Kuji S, Tanaka A, Takahashi N . The issues regarding postoperative adjuvant therapy and prognostic risk factors for patients with stage I-II cervical cancer: A review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017; 43(4):617-626. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13282. View

2.
Ebina Y, Yaegashi N, Katabuchi H, Nagase S, Udagawa Y, Hachisuga T . Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2011 for the treatment of uterine cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015; 20(2):240-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0806-7. View

3.
Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Matsuo K, Kawano M, Suzuki O, Miyatake T . Impact of histological subtype on survival of patients with surgically-treated stage IA2-IIB cervical cancer: adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 127(1):114-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.021. View

4.
Zaino R, Ward S, Delgado G, Bundy B, GORE H, Fetter G . Histopathologic predictors of the behavior of surgically treated stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1992; 69(7):1750-8. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69:7<1750::aid-cncr2820690717>3.0.co;2-s. View

5.
Obrzut B, Semczuk A, Narog M, Obrzut M, Krol P . Prognostic Parameters for Patients with Cervical Cancer FIGO Stages IA2-IIB: A Long-Term Follow-Up. Oncology. 2017; 93(2):106-114. DOI: 10.1159/000471766. View