» Articles » PMID: 29351295

Effects of a Population-based, Person-centred and Integrated Care Service on Health, Wellbeing and Self-management of Community-living Older Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial on Embrace

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Jan 20
PMID 29351295
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of the population-based, person-centred and integrated care service 'Embrace' at twelve months on three domains comprising health, wellbeing and self-management among community-living older people.

Methods: Embrace supports older adults to age in place. A multidisciplinary team provides care and support, with intensity depending on the older adults' risk profile. A randomised controlled trial was conducted in fifteen general practices in the Netherlands. Older adults (≥75 years) were included and stratified into three risk profiles: Robust, Frail and Complex care needs, and randomised to Embrace or care as usual (CAU). Outcomes were recorded in three domains. The EuroQol-5D-3L and visual analogue scale, INTERMED for the Elderly Self-Assessment, Groningen Frailty Indicator and Katz-15 were used for the domain 'Health.' The Groningen Well-being Indicator and two quality of life questions measured 'Wellbeing.' The Self-Management Ability Scale and Partners in Health scale for older adults (PIH-OA) were used for 'Self-management.' Primary and secondary outcome measurements differed per risk profile. Data were analysed with multilevel mixed-model techniques using intention-to-treat and complete case analyses, for the whole sample and per risk profile.

Results: 1456 eligible older adults participated (49%) and were randomized to Embrace (n(T0) = 747, n(T1) = 570, mean age 80.6 years (SD 4.5), 54.2% female) and CAU (n(T0) = 709, n(T1) = 561, mean age 80.8 years (SD 4.7), 55.6% female). Embrace participants showed a greater-but clinically irrelevant-improvement in self-management (PIH-OA Knowledge subscale effect size [ES] = 0.14), and a greater-but clinically relevant-deterioration in health (ADL ES = 0.10; physical ADL ES = 0.13) compared to CAU. No differences in change in wellbeing were observed. This picture was also found in the risk profiles. Complete case analyses showed comparable results.

Conclusions: This study found no clear benefits to receiving person-centred and integrated care for twelve months for the domains of health, wellbeing and self-management in community-living older adults.

Citing Articles

Multidisciplinary home-based interventions in adverse events and quality of life among frail older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ruiz-Grao M, Alvarez-Bueno C, Garrido-Miguel M, Berlanga-Macias C, Gonzalez-Molinero M, Rodriguez-Martin B Heliyon. 2024; 10(21):e40015.

PMID: 39583819 PMC: 11582431. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40015.


Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment adapted to primary care when provided by a nurse or a general practitioner: the CEpiA cluster-randomised trial.

Orcel V, Banh L, Bastuji-Garin S, Renard V, Boutin E, Gouja A BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):414.

PMID: 39334117 PMC: 11437618. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03613-7.


Optimizing Older Adult Mental Health in Support of Healthy Ageing: A Pluralistic Framework to Inform Transformative Change across Community and Healthcare Domains.

Horgan S, Prorok J, Ellis K, Mullaly L, Cassidy K, Seitz D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(6).

PMID: 38928911 PMC: 11203904. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21060664.


Effectiveness of information and communication technology-based integrated care for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tian Y, Wang S, Zhang Y, Meng L, Li X Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1276574.

PMID: 38249380 PMC: 10797014. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1276574.


Complex interventions for improving independent living and quality of life amongst community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ho L, Malden S, McGill K, Shimonovich M, Frost H, Aujla N Age Ageing. 2023; 52(7).

PMID: 37505991 PMC: 10378722. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad132.


References
1.
Peters L, Boter H, Buskens E, Slaets J . Measurement properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012; 13(6):546-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.04.007. View

2.
Gustafsson M, Kristensson J, Holst G, Willman A, Bohman D . Case managers for older persons with multi-morbidity and their everyday work - a focused ethnography. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013; 13:496. PMC: 3893533. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-496. View

3.
Spoorenberg S, Uittenbroek R, Middel B, Kremer B, Reijneveld S, Wynia K . Embrace, a model for integrated elderly care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness regarding patient outcomes, service use, costs, and quality of care. BMC Geriatr. 2013; 13:62. PMC: 3702391. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-62. View

4.
Beswick A, Rees K, Dieppe P, Ayis S, Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J . Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008; 371(9614):725-35. PMC: 2262920. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60342-6. View

5.
Brooks R . EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996; 37(1):53-72. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6. View