» Articles » PMID: 29350744

Preventing Mesh Pore Collapse by Designing Mesh Pores With Auxetic Geometries: A Comprehensive Evaluation Via Computational Modeling

Overview
Journal J Biomech Eng
Date 2018 Jan 20
PMID 29350744
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) meshes are exposed to predominately tensile loading conditions in vivo that can lead to pore collapse by 70-90%, decreasing overall porosity and providing a plausible mechanism for the contraction/shrinkage of mesh observed following implantation. To prevent pore collapse, we proposed to design synthetic meshes with a macrostructure that results in auxetic behavior, the pores expand laterally, instead of contracting when loaded. Such behavior can be achieved with a range of auxetic structures/geometries. This study utilized finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the behavior of mesh models with eight auxetic pore geometries subjected to uniaxial loading to evaluate their potential to allow for pore expansion while simultaneously providing resistance to tensile loading. Overall, substituting auxetic geometries for standard pore geometries yielded more pore expansion, but often at the expense of increased model elongation, with two of the eight auxetics not able to maintain pore expansion at higher levels of tension. Meshes with stable pore geometries that remain open with loading will afford the ingrowth of host tissue into the pores and improved integration of the mesh. Given the demonstrated ability of auxetic geometries to allow for pore size maintenance (and pore expansion), auxetically designed meshes have the potential to significantly impact surgical outcomes and decrease the likelihood of major mesh-related complications.

Citing Articles

Auxetic Biomedical Metamaterials for Orthopedic Surgery Applications: A Comprehensive Review.

Sun M, Hu X, Tian L, Yang X, Min L Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(8):1801-1815.

PMID: 38961661 PMC: 11293933. DOI: 10.1111/os.14142.


Regenerative Medicine in Gynecology.

Balough J, Moalli P Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 143(6):767-773.

PMID: 38663014 PMC: 11216342. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005590.


The influence of the combined impairments and apical mesh surgery on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor system.

Xue X, Zheng Q, Gao Z, Shen J, Yao T Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 11:1292407.

PMID: 38260732 PMC: 10800848. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1292407.


Deformation and Durability of Soft Three-Dimensional-Printed Polycarbonate Urethane Porous Membranes for Potential Use in Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Bachtiar E, Knight K, Moalli P, Gall K J Biomech Eng. 2023; 145(9).

PMID: 37216313 PMC: 10259470. DOI: 10.1115/1.4062490.


Direct Ink Writing of Biocompatible Nanocellulose and Chitosan Hydrogels for Implant Mesh Matrices.

Ajdary R, Reyes G, Kuula J, Raussi-Lehto E, Mikkola T, Kankuri E ACS Polym Au. 2022; 2(2):97-107.

PMID: 35445214 PMC: 9011395. DOI: 10.1021/acspolymersau.1c00045.


References
1.
Orenstein S, Saberski E, Kreutzer D, Novitsky Y . Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. J Surg Res. 2011; 176(2):423-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.031. View

2.
Holt B, Tripathi A, Morgan J . Viscoelastic response of human skin to low magnitude physiologically relevant shear. J Biomech. 2008; 41(12):2689-95. PMC: 2584606. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.008. View

3.
Greca F, Souza-Filho Z, Giovanini A, Rubin M, Kuenzer R, Reese F . The influence of porosity on the integration histology of two polypropylene meshes for the treatment of abdominal wall defects in dogs. Hernia. 2007; 12(1):45-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-007-0276-6. View

4.
Otto J, Kaldenhoff E, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Muhl T, Klinge U . Elongation of textile pelvic floor implants under load is related to complete loss of effective porosity, thereby favoring incorporation in scar plates. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013; 102(4):1079-84. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34767. View

5.
Cobb W, Burns J, Kercher K, Matthews B, Norton H, Heniford B . Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults. J Surg Res. 2005; 129(2):231-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.06.015. View