The Mothers on Respect (MOR) Index: Measuring Quality, Safety, and Human Rights in Childbirth

Overview

Journal SSM Popul Health

Date 2018 Jan 20

PMID 29349217

Citations 74

Authors

Saraswathi Vedam

Kathrin Stoll

Nicholas Rubashkin

Kelsey Martin

Zoe Miller-Vedam

Hermine Hayes-Klein

Ganga Jolicoeur

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Abuse of human rights in childbirth are documented in low, middle and high resource countries. A systematic review across 34 countries by the WHO Research Group on the Treatment of Women During Childbirth concluded that there is no consensus at a global level on how disrespectful maternity care is measured. In British Columbia, a community-led participatory action research team developed a survey tool that assesses women's experiences with maternity care, including disrespect and discrimination.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was completed by women of childbearing age from diverse communities across British Columbia. Several items (31/130) assessed characteristics of their communication with care providers. We assessed the psychometric properties of two versions of a scale (7 and 14 items), among women who described experiences with a single maternity provider (=2514 experiences among 1672 women). We also calculated the proportion and selected characteristics of women who scored in the bottom 10th percentile (those who experienced the least respectful care).

Results: To demonstrate replicability, we report psychometric results separately for three samples of women (S1 and S2) (=2271), (S3, =1613). Analysis of item-to-total correlations and factor loadings indicated a single construct 14-item scale, which we named the Mothers on Respect index (MORi). Items in MORi assess the nature of respectful patient-provider interactions and their impact on a person's sense of comfort, behavior, and perceptions of racism or discrimination. The scale exhibited good internal consistency reliability. MORi- scores among these samples differed by socio-demographic profile, health status, experience with interventions and mode of birth, planned and actual place of birth, and type of provider.

Conclusion: The MOR index is a reliable, patient-informed quality and safety indicator that can be applied across jurisdictions to assess the nature of provider-patient relationships, and access to person-centered maternity care.

Citing Articles

Patient-clinician communication amongst black perinatal people: a systematic review.

Duberstein Z, Bell K, Poleshuck E, Arnold M, H McDaniel S, Alio A Arch Womens Ment Health. 2025; .

PMID: 40067395 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-025-01574-1.

Preparation, Experience of Discrimination, and Birth Experience Among Women Birthing in Ohio.

Jones Spurlock E, Pickler R, Nist M J Perinat Educ. 2025; 34(1):39-50.

PMID: 40061093 PMC: 11885112. DOI: 10.1891/JPE-2024-0019.

A Spanish-Language Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Trust in Pregnancy Care Clinician.

Molina R, Bazan M, Hacker M, Kaimal A, Alegria M, Fernandez L JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2460465.

PMID: 39964680 PMC: 11836756. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60465.

A multi-level meta-analysis of the relationship between decision-making during birth and postpartum mental health.

Arnold L, Volkel M, Rosendahl J, Rost M Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025; 13(1):2456032.

PMID: 39911766 PMC: 11795756. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2025.2456032.

Validation of the Greek version of Mothers on Respect (MOR) index.

Serpetini E, Sarantaki A, Lykeridou A, Vlachou M, Diamanti A Eur J Midwifery. 2025; 9.

PMID: 39816374 PMC: 11734315. DOI: 10.18332/ejm/196694.

References

Swahnberg K, Schei B, Hilden M, Halmesmaki E, Sidenius K, Steingrimsdottir T . Patients' experiences of abuse in health care: a Nordic study on prevalence and associated factors in gynecological patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86(3):349-56. DOI: 10.1080/00016340601185368. View

Scupholme A, Paine L, Lang J, Kumar S, DeJoseph J . Time associated with components of clinical services rendered by nurse-midwives. Sample data from phase II of nurse-midwifery care to vulnerable populations in the United States. J Nurse Midwifery. 1994; 39(1):5-12. DOI: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90036-1. View

Lothian J . Being safe: making the decision to have a planned home birth in the United States. J Clin Ethics. 2013; 24(3):266-75. View

Bohren M, Vogel J, Hunter E, Lutsiv O, Makh S, Souza J . The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(6):e1001847. PMC: 4488322. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. View

Symon A, Winter C, Donnan P, Kirkham M . Examining autonomy's boundaries: a follow-up review of perinatal mortality cases in UK independent midwifery. Birth. 2010; 37(4):280-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00422.x. View

Soet J, Brack G, DiIorio C . Prevalence and predictors of women's experience of psychological trauma during childbirth. Birth. 2003; 30(1):36-46. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00215.x. View

Lindgren H, Erlandsson K . Women's experiences of empowerment in a planned home birth: a Swedish population-based study. Birth. 2010; 37(4):309-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00426.x. View

Vogel J, Bohren M, Tuncalp O, Oladapo O, Adanu R, Balde M . How women are treated during facility-based childbirth: development and validation of measurement tools in four countries - phase 1 formative research study protocol. Reprod Health. 2015; 12:60. PMC: 4510886. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-015-0047-2. View

. Mother-baby friendly birthing facilities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014; 128(2):95-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.013. View

10.

Hodnett E . Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(5 Suppl Nature):S160-72. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.121141. View

11.

Cheyney M, Everson C, Burcher P . Homebirth transfers in the United States: narratives of risk, fear, and mutual accommodation. Qual Health Res. 2014; 24(4):443-56. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314524028. View

12.

Jackson M, Dahlen H, Schmied V . Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths. Midwifery. 2012; 28(5):561-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.002. View

13.

Okafor I, Ugwu E, Obi S . Disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in a low-income country. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014; 128(2):110-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.08.015. View

14.

Ten Hoope-Bender P, De Bernis L, Campbell J, Downe S, Fauveau V, Fogstad H . Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet. 2014; 384(9949):1226-35. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60930-2. View

15.

McRae D, Muhajarine N, Stoll K, Mayhew M, Vedam S, Mpofu D . Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care. SSM Popul Health. 2018; 2:182-193. PMC: 5757823. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.01.007. View

16.

Jou J, Kozhimannil K, Johnson P, Sakala C . Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women. Health Serv Res. 2014; 50(4):961-81. PMC: 4545342. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12231. View

17.

Abuya T, Warren C, Miller N, Njuki R, Ndwiga C, Maranga A . Exploring the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0123606. PMC: 4401776. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123606. View

18.

Hodnett E, Downe S, Walsh D . Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (8):CD000012. PMC: 7061256. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub4. View

19.

Kruk M, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Ramsey K, Moyo W, Freedman L . Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2018; 33(1):e26-e33. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czu079. View

20.

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D . Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (9):CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub4. View