» Articles » PMID: 29349160

Theoretical Basis and Explanation for the Relationship Between Area-level Social Inequalities and Population Oral Health Outcomes - A Scoping Review

Overview
Date 2018 Jan 20
PMID 29349160
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was conducted to review the evidence on the association between area-level social inequalities and population oral health according to type and extent of social theories. A scoping review was conducted of studies, which assessed the association between area-level social inequality measures, and population oral health outcomes including self-rated oral health, number of teeth, dental caries, periodontal disease, tooth loss, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and dental pain. A search strategy was applied to identify evidence on PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, Web of Science, ERIC, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, references of selected studies, and further grey literature. A qualitative content analysis of the selected studies was conducted to identify theories and categorize studies according to their theoretical basis. A total of 2892 studies were identified with 16 included in the review. Seven types of social theories were used on 48 occasions within the selected studies including: psychosocial (=13), behavioural (=10), neo-material (=10), social capital (=6), social cohesion (=4), material (=3) and social support (=2). Of the selected studies, four explicitly tested social theories as pathways from inequalities to population oral health outcomes, three used a theoretical construct, seven used theories for post-hoc explanation and two did not have any use of theory. In conclusion, psychosocial theories were used most frequently. Although theories were often mentioned, majority of these studies did not test a social theory.

Citing Articles

Generative AI Decision-Making Attributes in Complex Health Services: A Rapid Review.

Doreswamy N, Horstmanshof L Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78257.

PMID: 40026934 PMC: 11871968. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78257.


Oral health status of Dutch Armed Forces recruits in the years 2000, 2010 and 2020, a retrospective repeated cross-sectional study.

de la Court A, Opdam N, Bronkhorst E, Laske M, Huysmans M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):912.

PMID: 39118065 PMC: 11312750. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04687-8.


The Effect of Financial Strain on the Health Outcomes of Older Mexican-Origin Adults: Findings From the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiological Study of the Elderly (H-EPESE).

Hernandez M, Markides K, Cantu P Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2024; 99(1):3-24.

PMID: 38354308 PMC: 11295423. DOI: 10.1177/00914150241231187.


Attributes That Influence Human Decision-Making in Complex Health Services: Scoping Review.

Doreswamy N, Horstmanshof L JMIR Hum Factors. 2023; 10:e46490.

PMID: 38117553 PMC: 10765291. DOI: 10.2196/46490.


Occupational Difference in Oral Health Status and Behaviors in Japanese Workers: A Literature Review.

Irie K, Tsuneishi M, Saijo M, Suzuki C, Yamamoto T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13).

PMID: 35805739 PMC: 9265852. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138081.


References
1.
Muntaner C, Lynch J . Income inequality, social cohesion, and class relations: a critique of Wilkinson's neo-Durkheimian research program. Int J Health Serv. 1999; 29(1):59-81. DOI: 10.2190/G8QW-TT09-67PL-QTNC. View

2.
Kawachi I, Kennedy B . Income inequality and health: pathways and mechanisms. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34(1 Pt 2):215-27. PMC: 1088996. View

3.
Krieger N . Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. Int J Health Serv. 1999; 29(2):295-352. DOI: 10.2190/M11W-VWXE-KQM9-G97Q. View

4.
Muntaner C, Lynch J, Oates G . The social class determinants of income inequality and social cohesion. Int J Health Serv. 2000; 29(4):699-732. DOI: 10.2190/HNC9-BEFF-7UWL-92Y2. View

5.
Diez-Roux A, Link B, Northridge M . A multilevel analysis of income inequality and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50(5):673-87. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00320-2. View