» Articles » PMID: 29349078

Categorisation of Mobile EEG: A Researcher's Perspective

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 Jan 20
PMID 29349078
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Researchers are increasingly attempting to undertake electroencephalography (EEG) recordings in novel environments and contexts outside of the traditional static laboratory setting. The term "mobile EEG," although commonly used to describe many of these undertakings, is ambiguous, since it attempts to encompass a wide range of EEG device mobility, participant mobility, and system specifications used across investigations. To provide quantitative parameters for "mobile EEG," we developed a Categorisation of Mobile EEG (CoME) scheme based upon scoring of device mobility (, from 0, off-body, to 5, head-mounted with no additional equipment), participant mobility (, from 0, static, to 5, unconstrained running), system specification (, from 4, lowest, to 20, highest), and number of channels () used. The CoME scheme was applied to twenty-nine published mobile EEG studies. Device mobility scores ranged from 0 to 4, participant mobility scores from 0 to 4, and system specification scores from 6 to 17. The format of the scores for the four parameters is given, for example, as (2, 4, 17, 32) and readily enables comparisons across studies. Our CoME scheme enables researchers to quantify the degree of device mobility, participant mobility, and system specification used in their "mobile EEG" investigations in a standardised way.

Citing Articles

Exploring Relevant Features for EEG-Based Investigation of Sound Perception in Naturalistic Soundscapes.

Haupt T, Rosenkranz M, Bleichner M, Bleichner M eNeuro. 2025; 12(1.

PMID: 39753371 PMC: 11747973. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0287-24.2024.


Imagine going left versus imagine going right: whole-body motion on the lateral axis.

Patel K, Stotter J, Pali M, Giannopulu I Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31558.

PMID: 39738135 PMC: 11686341. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57220-w.


Preprocessing choices for P3 analyses with mobile EEG: A systematic literature review and interactive exploration.

Jacobsen N, Kristanto D, Welp S, Inceler Y, Debener S Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14743.

PMID: 39697161 PMC: 11656290. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14743.


Mobile EEG for the study of cognitive-motor interference during swimming?.

Klapprott M, Debener S Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1466853.

PMID: 39268221 PMC: 11390454. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1466853.


A systematic review of mobile brain/body imaging studies using the P300 event-related potentials to investigate cognition beyond the laboratory.

Grasso-Cladera A, Bremer M, Ladouce S, Parada F Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(4):631-659.

PMID: 38834886 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01190-z.


References
1.
Davies P, Gavin W . Validating the diagnosis of sensory processing disorders using EEG technology. Am J Occup Ther. 2007; 61(2):176-89. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.61.2.176. View

2.
Wascher E, Heppner H, Hoffmann S . Towards the measurement of event-related EEG activity in real-life working environments. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013; 91(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.10.006. View

3.
Robertson C, Marino F . Prefrontal and motor cortex EEG responses and their relationship to ventilatory thresholds during exhaustive incremental exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015; 115(9):1939-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3177-x. View

4.
Hairston W, Whitaker K, Ries A, Vettel J, Bradford J, Kerick S . Usability of four commercially-oriented EEG systems. J Neural Eng. 2014; 11(4):046018. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046018. View

5.
Ramoser H, Pfurtscheller G . Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2001; 8(4):441-6. DOI: 10.1109/86.895946. View