» Articles » PMID: 29344009

Evaluation of Nipple Aspirate Fluid As a Diagnostic Tool for Early Detection of Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Clin Proteomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Jan 19
PMID 29344009
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been tremendous progress in detection of breast cancer in postmenopausal women, resulting in two-thirds of women surviving more than 20 years after treatment. However, breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in premenopausal women. Breast cancer is increasing in younger women due to changes in life-style as well as those at high risk as carriers of mutations in high-penetrance genes. Premenopausal women with breast cancer are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive tumours and therefore have a lower survival rate. Mammography plays an important role in detecting breast cancer in postmenopausal women, but is considerably less sensitive in younger women. Imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced MRI improve sensitivity, but as with all imaging approaches, cannot differentiate between benign and malignant growths. Hence, current well-established detection methods are falling short of providing adequate safety, convenience, sensitivity and specificity for premenopausal women on a global level, necessitating the exploration of new methods. In order to detect and prevent the disease in high risk women as early as possible, methods that require more frequent monitoring need to be developed. The emergence of "omics" strategies over the last 20 years, enabling the characterisation and understanding of breast cancer at the molecular level, are providing the potential for long term, longitudinal monitoring of the disease. Tissue and serum biomarkers for breast cancer stratification, diagnosis and predictive outcome have emerged, but have not successfully translated into clinical screening for early detection of the disease. The use of breast-specific liquid biopsies, such as nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), a natural secretion produced by breast epithelial cells, can be collected non-invasively for biomarker profiling. As we move towards an age of active surveillance, home-based liquid biopsy collection kits are increasingly being applied and these could provide a paradigm shift where NAF biomarker profiling is used for routine breast health monitoring. The current status of established and newly emerging imaging techniques for early detection of breast cancer and the potential for alternative biomarker screening of liquid biopsies, particularly those applied to high-risk, premenopausal women, will be reviewed.

Citing Articles

Metabolomics-Driven Biomarker Discovery for Breast Cancer Prognosis and Diagnosis.

Kaur R, Gupta S, Kulshrestha S, Khandelwal V, Pandey S, Kumar A Cells. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39791706 PMC: 11720085. DOI: 10.3390/cells14010005.


Unveiling Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers: Harnessing Biosensor Technology for Volatile Organic Compound Detection.

Golfinopoulou R, Hatziagapiou K, Mavrikou S, Kintzios S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(14).

PMID: 39066110 PMC: 11281049. DOI: 10.3390/s24144712.


Knowledge of Non-Invasive Biomarkers of Breast Cancer, Risk Factors, and BSE Practices Among Nursing Undergraduates in Farasan Island, KSA.

Sayed S, Dailah H, Nagarajan S, Abdelwahab S, Abadi S, Akhtar N SAGE Open Nurs. 2024; 10:23779608241248519.

PMID: 38681865 PMC: 11055480. DOI: 10.1177/23779608241248519.


The Diagnostic Value of microRNA Expression Analysis in Detecting Intraductal Papillomas in Patients with Pathological Nipple Discharge.

Makineli S, Vriens M, Witkamp A, van Diest P, Moelans C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(3).

PMID: 38339089 PMC: 10855314. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25031812.


Biomarker Reproducibility Challenge: A Review of Non-Nucleotide Biomarker Discovery Protocols from Body Fluids in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Safari F, Kehelpannala C, Safarchi A, Batarseh A, Vafaee F Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(10).

PMID: 37345117 PMC: 10216598. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102780.


References
1.
Mushlin A, Kouides R, Shapiro D . Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14(2):143-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00019-6. View

2.
Pisano E, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum J, Acharyya S . Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(17):1773-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa052911. View

3.
Guth U, Huang D, Huber M, Schotzau A, Wruk D, Holzgreve W . Tumor size and detection in breast cancer: Self-examination and clinical breast examination are at their limit. Cancer Detect Prev. 2008; 32(3):224-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2008.04.002. View

4.
Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D . Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148(9):671-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00007. View

5.
Danforth D, Warner A, Wangsa D, Ried T, Duelli D, Filie A . An Improved Breast Epithelial Sampling Method for Molecular Profiling and Biomarker Analysis in Women at Risk for Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2015; 9:31-40. PMC: 4462519. DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S23577. View