» Articles » PMID: 29343938

CINdex: A Bioconductor Package for Analysis of Chromosome Instability in DNA Copy Number Data

Overview
Journal Cancer Inform
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2018 Jan 19
PMID 29343938
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The CINdex Bioconductor package addresses an important area of high-throughput genomic analysis. It calculates the chromosome instability (CIN) index, a novel measurement that quantitatively characterizes genome-wide copy number alterations (CNAs) as a measure of CIN. The advantage of this package is an ability to compare CIN index values between several groups for patients (case and control groups), which is a typical use case in translational research. The differentially changed cytobands or chromosomes can then be linked to genes located in the affected genomic regions, as well as pathways. This enables in-depth systems biology-based network analysis and assessment of the impact of CNA on various biological processes or clinical outcomes. This package was successfully applied to analysis of DNA copy number data in colorectal cancer as a part of multi-omics integrative study as well as for analysis of several other cancer types. The source code, along with an end-to-end tutorial, and example data are freely available in Bioconductor at http://bioconductor.org/packages/CINdex/.

Citing Articles

Chromosomal instability: a key driver in glioma pathogenesis and progression.

Mazzoleni A, Awuah W, Sanker V, Bharadwaj H, Aderinto N, Tan J Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):451.

PMID: 39227895 PMC: 11373396. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-02043-8.


CINmetrics: an R package for analyzing copy number aberrations as a measure of chromosomal instability.

Oza V, Fisher J, Darji R, Lasseigne B PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15244.

PMID: 37123011 PMC: 10143595. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15244.


The Long Noncoding RNA CCAT2 Induces Chromosomal Instability Through BOP1-AURKB Signaling.

Chen B, Dragomir M, Fabris L, Bayraktar R, Knutsen E, Liu X Gastroenterology. 2020; 159(6):2146-2162.e33.

PMID: 32805281 PMC: 7725986. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.018.


Ontogenetic and Pathogenetic Views on Somatic Chromosomal Mosaicism.

Iourov I, Vorsanova S, Yurov Y, Kutsev S Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(5).

PMID: 31109140 PMC: 6562967. DOI: 10.3390/genes10050379.


The REMBRANDT study, a large collection of genomic data from brain cancer patients.

Gusev Y, Bhuvaneshwar K, Song L, Zenklusen J, Fine H, Madhavan S Sci Data. 2018; 5:180158.

PMID: 30106394 PMC: 6091243. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.158.

References
1.
van Wezel T, Lombaerts M, van Roon E, Philippo K, Baelde H, Szuhai K . Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q. Breast Cancer Res. 2005; 7(6):R998-1004. PMC: 1410740. DOI: 10.1186/bcr1337. View

2.
Lawrence M, Huber W, Pages H, Aboyoun P, Carlson M, Gentleman R . Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(8):e1003118. PMC: 3738458. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118. View

3.
Hupe P, Stransky N, Thiery J, Radvanyi F, Barillot E . Analysis of array CGH data: from signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(18):3413-22. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth418. View

4.
Alkebsi L, Handa H, Yokohama A, Saitoh T, Tsukamoto N, Murakami H . Chromosome 16q genes and are correlated and frequently methylated in human lymphoma. Oncol Lett. 2016; 12(5):3523-3530. PMC: 5103978. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5116. View

5.
Crespo I, Vital A, Nieto A, Rebelo O, Tao H, Lopes M . Detailed characterization of alterations of chromosomes 7, 9, and 10 in glioblastomas as assessed by single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. J Mol Diagn. 2011; 13(6):634-47. PMC: 3194060. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.06.003. View