» Articles » PMID: 29343709

Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Dragonfly Wing and Body Motion During Voluntary Take-off

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jan 19
PMID 29343709
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a detailed analysis of the voluntary take-off procedure of a dragonfly. The motions of the body and wings are recorded using two high-speed cameras at Beihang University. The experimental results show that the dragonfly becomes airborne after approximately one wingbeat and then leaves the ground. During this process, the maximum vertical acceleration could reach 20 m/s. Evidence also shows that acceleration is generated only by the aerodynamic force induced by the flapping of wings. The dragonfly voluntary take-off procedure is divided into four phases with distinctive features. The variation in phase difference between the forewing and hindwing and angle of attack in the down-stroke are calculated to explain the different features of the four phases. In terms of the key parameters of flapping, the phase difference increases from approximately 0 to 110 degrees; the angle of attack in down-stroke reaches the maximum at first and then decreases in the following take-off procedure. Due to experimental limitations, 2-D simulations are conducted using the immersed boundary method. The results indicate that the phase difference and the angle of attack are highly correlated with the unsteady fluid field around the dragonfly's wings and body, which determines the generation of aerodynamic forces.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Hindwing Trajectories on Wake-Wing Interactions in the Configuration of Two Flapping Wings in Tandem.

He X, Wang C, Jia P, Zhong Z Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(7).

PMID: 39056847 PMC: 11274670. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9070406.


Three-Dimensional Printable Magnetic Microfibers: Development and Characterization for Four-Dimensional Printing.

Han Y, Lu Q, Xie J, Song K, Luo D 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2024; 11(2):e638-e654.

PMID: 38689922 PMC: 11057696. DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2022.0103.


Experimental Investigation on Aerodynamic Performance of Inclined Hovering with Asymmetric Wing Rotation.

Zheng M, Peng L, Su G, Pan T, Li Q Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 38667236 PMC: 11047828. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9040225.


Numerical investigation on the aerodynamic efficiency of bio-inspired corrugated and cambered airfoils in ground effect.

Abdizadeh G, Farokhinejad M, Ghasemloo S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):19117.

PMID: 36351992 PMC: 9646766. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23590-2.


Aerodynamic Performance of a Dragonfly-Inspired Tandem Wing System for a Biomimetic Micro Air Vehicle.

Salami E, Montazer E, Ward T, Ghazali N, Badruddin I Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:787220.

PMID: 35662843 PMC: 9159522. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.787220.


References
1.
Card G, Dickinson M . Performance trade-offs in the flight initiation of Drosophila. J Exp Biol. 2008; 211(Pt 3):341-53. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.012682. View

2.
Sane S . The aerodynamics of insect flight. J Exp Biol. 2003; 206(Pt 23):4191-208. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00663. View

3.
Wakeling J, Ellington C . Dragonfly flight. II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight. J Exp Biol. 1997; 200(Pt 3):557-582. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.3.557. View

4.
Young J, Walker S, Bomphrey R, Taylor G, Thomas A . Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency. Science. 2009; 325(5947):1549-52. DOI: 10.1126/science.1175928. View

5.
Fontaine E, Zabala F, Dickinson M, Burdick J . Wing and body motion during flight initiation in Drosophila revealed by automated visual tracking. J Exp Biol. 2009; 212(Pt 9):1307-23. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.025379. View