» Articles » PMID: 29340117

The Regulation of Pre-metastatic Niche Formation by Neutrophils

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jan 18
PMID 29340117
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Metastasis is a multistep process requiring tumor cell detachment from the primary tumor and migration to target organs through the lymphatic or blood circulatory systems. Specific organs are predisposed to metastases in certain cancers and the formation of supportive metastatic microenvironment determines tumor cell homing. Such an environment is provided by a pre-metastatic niche that is formed through the recruitment of bone marrow-derived myeloid cells, however the mechanisms of its formation are not fully understood. Recent evidence suggests that the primary tumor itself modulates the environment of secondary organs prior to tumor cell dissemination. The contribution of neutrophils to the formation of the pre-metastatic niche is getting growing attention. Obviously, neutrophils can affect the development of metastasis in two contradicting ways, by either stimulation or inhibition of this process, depending on the activation status. Pro-tumor neutrophils actively support metastasis formation by different mechanisms, including the formation of pre-metastatic niche, tumor cell attraction, and the direct support of tumor cell proliferation. Moreover, suppressive neutrophils, which are the granulocytic arm of MDSC, promote tumor progression by dampening anti-tumor T cell immunity. On the other hand, anti-tumor neutrophils can inhibit metastasis formation by the cytotoxicity towards tumor cells in the circulation or at the pre-metastatic site, and even via stimulation of T cell proliferation. Apparently, the regulation of the pro- or anti-tumor neutrophil properties has significant implications on metastatic spread in the host. Here we provide an up to date overview of the different roles neutrophils play in regulating the metastatic processes.

Citing Articles

Neutrophil Engulfment in Cancer: Friend or Foe?.

Lu T, Li W Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941753 PMC: 11816126. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030384.


Brd7 loss reawakens dormant metastasis initiating cells in lung by forging an immunosuppressive niche.

Mondal J, Zhang J, Qing F, Li S, Kumar D, Huse J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1378.

PMID: 39910049 PMC: 11799300. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56347-2.


Triple-negative breast cancer modifies the systemic immune landscape and alters neutrophil functionality.

Bakker N, Garner H, van Dyk E, Champanhet E, Klaver C, Duijst M NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025; 11(1):5.

PMID: 39843922 PMC: 11754814. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-025-00721-2.


Bidirectional role of neutrophils in tumor development.

Luyang H, Zeng F, Lei Y, He Q, Zhou Y, Xu J Mol Cancer. 2025; 24(1):22.

PMID: 39819428 PMC: 11737241. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-025-02228-7.


Neutrophils in cancer: from biology to therapy.

Koenderman L, Vrisekoop N Cell Mol Immunol. 2024; 22(1):4-23.

PMID: 39653768 PMC: 11686117. DOI: 10.1038/s41423-024-01244-9.


References
1.
Reali E, Guerrini R, Moretti S, Spisani S, Lanza F, Tomatis R . Polymorphonuclear neutrophils pulsed with synthetic peptides efficiently activate memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 1996; 60(2):207-13. DOI: 10.1002/jlb.60.2.207. View

2.
Moses K, Brandau S . Human neutrophils: Their role in cancer and relation to myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Semin Immunol. 2016; 28(2):187-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2016.03.018. View

3.
Joyce J, Pollard J . Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9(4):239-52. PMC: 3251309. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2618. View

4.
Potter N, Harding C . Neutrophils process exogenous bacteria via an alternate class I MHC processing pathway for presentation of peptides to T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2001; 167(5):2538-46. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.5.2538. View

5.
Berger-Achituv S, Brinkmann V, Abu Abed U, Kuhn L, Ben-Ezra J, Elhasid R . A proposed role for neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer immunoediting. Front Immunol. 2013; 4:48. PMC: 3589747. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00048. View