» Articles » PMID: 29339654

Comparative Burden of Subclinical Tremor in a Cohort of Normal Individuals Stratified by Familial Risk for Essential Tremor

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Public Health
Date 2018 Jan 18
PMID 29339654
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The burden of mild (i.e., subclinical) tremor within essential tremor (ET) families is not fully understood. We assessed the burden of mild tremor in a cohort of 287 adults, none of whom reported tremor or were diagnosed with ET.

Methods: We recruited adults in 2 groups based on the familial risk for ET: 244 high-risk individuals (i.e., reporting one or more first-degree relative with ET) and 43 low-risk individuals (i.e., reporting no relatives with ET). Tremor was objectively assessed on 4 hand-drawn spirals (total spiral score = 0-12). Mild tremor was defined using 3 different cut points.

Results: The prevalence rates of mild tremor among high-risk individuals ranged from 41.4 to 98.4% and were highly dependent on the cut point. Above a certain threshold (i.e., a total spiral score ≥5), 1-in-5 (i.e., 19.7%) high-risk individuals exhibited mild tremor, whereas no low-risk individuals did. High-risk individuals were 3.09-4.50 times more likely than low-risk individuals to exhibit mild tremor.

Conclusion: The burden of ET extends beyond the boundaries of the clinically defined disease, and partially expressed forms of ET are abundant in ET families. This fact greatly complicates gene-finding studies and epidemiological studies whose goal is to detect disease-linked associations.

Citing Articles

More unaffected first-degree relatives of essential tremor cases have mild cognitive deficits than age-matched controls.

Meyers J, Hickman R, Cristal A, Factor-Litvak P, Cosentino S, Louis E Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018; 61:144-150.

PMID: 30404762 PMC: 6488412. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.10.030.

References
1.
Testa C . Key issues in essential tremor genetics research: Where are we now and how can we move forward?. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2013; 3. PMC: 3582856. DOI: 10.7916/D8Q23Z0Z. View

2.
Louis E, Ford B, Lee H, Andrews H . Does a screening questionnaire for essential tremor agree with the physician's examination?. Neurology. 1998; 50(5):1351-7. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.50.5.1351. View

3.
Benito-Leon J, Bermejo-Pareja F, Morales J, Vega S, Molina J . Prevalence of essential tremor in three elderly populations of central Spain. Mov Disord. 2003; 18(4):389-94. DOI: 10.1002/mds.10376. View

4.
Bain P, Findley L, Thompson P, Gresty M, Rothwell J, Harding A . A study of hereditary essential tremor. Brain. 1994; 117 ( Pt 4):805-24. DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.4.805. View

5.
Louis E, Ford B, Frucht S, Barnes L, Ottman R . Risk of tremor and impairment from tremor in relatives of patients with essential tremor: a community-based family study. Ann Neurol. 2001; 49(6):761-9. DOI: 10.1002/ana.1022. View