Transspinal Direct Current Stimulation Produces Persistent Plasticity in Human Motor Pathways

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2018 Jan 17

PMID 29335430

Citations 19

Authors

Lynda M Murray

Behdad Tahayori

Maria Knikou

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The spinal cord is an integration center for descending, ascending, and segmental neural signals. Noninvasive transspinal stimulation may thus constitute an effective method for concomitant modulation of local and distal neural circuits. In this study, we established changes in cortical excitability and input/output function of corticospinal and spinal neural circuits before, at 0-15 and at 30-45 minutes after cathodal, anodal, and sham transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) to the thoracic region in healthy individuals. We found that intracortical inhibition was different among stimulation polarities, however remained unchanged over time. Intracortical facilitation increased after cathodal and anodal tsDCS delivered with subjects seated, and decreased after cathodal tsDCS delivered with subjects lying supine. Both cathodal and anodal tsDCS increased corticospinal excitability, yet facilitation was larger and persisted for 30 minutes post stimulation only when cathodal tsDCS was delivered with subjects lying supine. Spinal input/output reflex function was decreased by cathodal and not anodal tsDCS. These changes may be attributed to altered spontaneous neural activity and membrane potentials of corticomotoneuronal cells by tsDCS involving similar mechanisms to those mediating motor learning. Our findings indicate that thoracic tsDCS has the ability to concomitantly alter cortical, corticospinal, and spinal motor output in humans.

Citing Articles

Effects of Transcranial and Trans-Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Gait and Fatigue in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study.

Cinbaz G, Sari Z, Oguz S, Tombul T, Hanoglu L, Fernandez-Perez J J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768555 PMC: 11728183. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247632.

From brain to spinal cord: neuromodulation by direct current stimulation and its promising effects as a treatment option for restless legs syndrome.

Dirks C, Bachmann C Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1278200.

PMID: 38333606 PMC: 10850250. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1278200.

The therapeutic effects of physical treatment for patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia: a narrative review.

Di Ludovico A, Ciarelli F, La Bella S, Scorrano G, Chiarelli F, Farello G Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1292527.

PMID: 38093754 PMC: 10716443. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1292527.

What Else Can Be Done by the Spinal Cord? A Review on the Effectiveness of Transpinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Stroke Recovery.

Marangolo P, Vasta S, Manfredini A, Caltagirone C Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(12).

PMID: 37373323 PMC: 10298920. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210173.

Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases motor cortical plasticity in healthy humans.

Koseki T, Kudo D, Yoshida K, Nito M, Takano K, Jin M Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1034451.

PMID: 37091256 PMC: 10115158. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1034451.

References

Delwaide P, Crenna P . Exteroceptive influences on lower limb motoneurons in man: spinal and supraspinal contributions. Adv Neurol. 1983; 39:797-807. View

Bolzoni F, Jankowska E . Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations. J Physiol. 2014; 593(4):947-66. PMC: 4398531. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.285940. View

McCreery D, AGNEW W, Bullara L, YUEN T . Partial pressure of oxygen in brain and peripheral nerve during damaging electrical stimulation. J Biomed Eng. 1990; 12(4):309-15. DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(90)90005-8. View

Roche N, Lackmy A, Achache V, Bussel B, Katz R . Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on spinal network excitability in humans. J Physiol. 2009; 587(Pt 23):5653-64. PMC: 2805376. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.177550. View

Knikou M, Dixon L, Santora D, Ibrahim M . Transspinal constant-current long-lasting stimulation: a new method to induce cortical and corticospinal plasticity. J Neurophysiol. 2015; 114(3):1486-99. PMC: 4556848. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00449.2015. View

Hordacre B, Goldsworthy M, Vallence A, Darvishi S, Moezzi B, Hamada M . Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex: A brain stimulation study. Brain Stimul. 2016; 10(3):588-595. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.001. View

Carter M, Maslovat D, Carlsen A . Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied over the supplementary motor area delays spontaneous antiphase-to-in-phase transitions. J Neurophysiol. 2014; 113(3):780-5. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00662.2014. View

Jankowska E, Kaczmarek D, Bolzoni F, Hammar I . Long-lasting increase in axonal excitability after epidurally applied DC. J Neurophysiol. 2017; 118(2):1210-1220. PMC: 5547254. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00148.2017. View

CREUTZFELDT O, FROMM G, KAPP H . Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. Exp Neurol. 1962; 5:436-52. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(62)90056-0. View

10.

Danner S, Krenn M, Hofstoetter U, Toth A, Mayr W, Minassian K . Body Position Influences Which Neural Structures Are Recruited by Lumbar Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0147479. PMC: 4721643. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147479. View

11.

Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo M, Nitsche M . Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol. 2013; 591(7):1987-2000. PMC: 3624864. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730. View

12.

Galea J, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P . Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(28):9115-22. PMC: 2760225. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2184-09.2009. View

13.

Knikou M . The H-reflex as a probe: pathways and pitfalls. J Neurosci Methods. 2008; 171(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.02.012. View

14.

Bocci T, Caleo M, Vannini B, Vergari M, Cogiamanian F, Rossi S . An unexpected target of spinal direct current stimulation: Interhemispheric connectivity in humans. J Neurosci Methods. 2015; 254:18-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.07.012. View

15.

Ziemann U, Rothwell J, Ridding M . Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1996; 496 ( Pt 3):873-81. PMC: 1160871. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021734. View

16.

Nitsche M, Paulus W . Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001; 57(10):1899-901. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899. View

17.

Parazzini M, Fiocchi S, Liorni I, Rossi E, Cogiamanian F, Vergari M . Modeling the current density generated by transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 125(11):2260-2270. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.02.027. View

18.

Ellaway P . Cumulative sum technique and its application to the analysis of peristimulus time histograms. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978; 45(2):302-4. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90017-2. View

19.

Cogiamanian F, Vergari M, Pulecchi F, Marceglia S, Priori A . Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 119(11):2636-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.249. View

20.

Chen R, Tam A, Butefisch C, Corwell B, Ziemann U, Rothwell J . Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80(6):2870-81. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.2870. View