» Articles » PMID: 29333340

Examining Differences in HPV Awareness and Knowledge and HPV Vaccine Awareness and Acceptability Between U.S. Hispanic and Island Puerto Rican Women

Overview
Date 2018 Jan 16
PMID 29333340
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In 2015, only 42% of Puerto Rican (PR) girls aged 13-17 and 44% of U.S. Hispanic girls aged 13-17 were vaccinated with all three Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine doses; These percentages were far lower than the Healthy People 2020 goal of 80% of girls aged 13-15 the goal of 80%. The purpose of this study was to examine potential differences in HPV awareness and knowledge and HPV vaccine awareness and acceptability between a population-based sample of U.S. Hispanic and island Puerto Rican women.

Methods: We restricted our analyses to female respondents from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2007 (n=375; U.S. Hispanic) and HINTS Puerto Rico 2009 (n=417; PR). Using the Wald chi-square test, we assessed if there were significant differences in HPV awareness and knowledge and HPV vaccine awareness and acceptability between U.S. Hispanic and island PR women. We then utilized logistic or multinomial regression to control for covariates on significant outcomes.

Results: Both groups of Hispanic women were highly knowledgeable that HPV causes cancer (89.2% in both samples) and that HPV is a sexually transmitted infection (78.1% [U.S. Hispanics] and 84.7% [PR]). Less than 10% of both groups recognized that HPV can clear on its own without treatment. Island PR women had significantly higher HPV vaccine awareness (66.9% vs. 61.0%; Wald X F(1, 97) = 16.03, p < .001) and were more accepting of the HPV vaccine for a real or hypothetical daughter, compared to U.S. Hispanic women (74.8% vs. 56.1%; Wald X F(2, 96) = 7.18, p < .001). However, after controlling for sociodemographic variables and survey group, there was no longer a difference between the two groups of women and HPV vaccine awareness (AOR = .53; 95% CI = .23, 1.24). Moreover, after controlled analysis, island PR women were significantly less likely to have their hypothetical daughter get the HPV vaccine, compared to U.S. Hispanic women (AOR = 0.26; 95% CI = .08, .81).

Conclusions: Future research focused on factors contributing to differences and similarities in HPV knowledge and awareness and HPV vaccine awareness and acceptability between these two groups of Hispanic women is warranted. Findings may assist in developing health education programs and media to promote HPV vaccination among both groups.

Citing Articles

Human papillomavirus awareness among foreign- and US-born Hispanics, United States, 2017-2018.

Escobar B, Amboree T, Sonawane K, Deshmukh A, McGee L, Rodriguez A Prev Med Rep. 2021; 22:101379.

PMID: 33996392 PMC: 8102157. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101379.

References
1.
Tortolero-Luna G, Finney Rutten L, Hesse B, Davis T, Kornfeld J, Sanchez M . Health and cancer information seeking practices and preferences in Puerto Rico: creating an evidence base for cancer communication efforts. J Health Commun. 2010; 15 Suppl 3:30-45. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522698. View

2.
Dempsey A, Zimet G, Davis R, Koutsky L . Factors that are associated with parental acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccines: a randomized intervention study of written information about HPV. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(5):1486-93. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1381. View

3.
Monnat S, Wallington S . Is there an association between maternal pap test use and adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination?. J Adolesc Health. 2013; 52(2):212-8. PMC: 4130478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.015. View

4.
Soto-Salgado M, Suarez E, Calo W, Cruz-Correa M, Figueroa-Valles N, Ortiz A . Incidence and mortality rates for colorectal cancer in Puerto Rico and among Hispanics, non-Hispanic whites, and non-Hispanic blacks in the United States, 1998-2002. Cancer. 2009; 115(13):3016-23. PMC: 4136810. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24340. View

5.
Fazekas K, Brewer N, Smith J . HPV vaccine acceptability in a rural Southern area. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008; 17(4):539-48. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0489. View