Exploring Entertainment Medicine and Professionalization of Self-Care: Interview Study Among Doctors on the Potential Effects of Digital Self-Tracking

Overview

Journal J Med Internet Res

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2018 Jan 14

PMID 29330140

Citations 15

Authors

Katleen Gabriels

Tania Moerenhout

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, digital self-tracking devices offer a plethora of possibilities to both healthy and chronically ill users who want to closely examine their body. This study suggests that self-tracking in a private setting will lead to shifting understandings in professional care. To provide more insight into these shifts, this paper seeks to lay bare the promises and challenges of self-tracking while staying close to the everyday professional experience of the physician.

Objective: The aim of this study was to (1) offer an analysis of how medical doctors evaluate self-tracking methods in their practice and (2) explore the anticipated shifts that digital self-care will bring about in relation to our findings and those of other studies.

Methods: A total of 12 in-depth semistructured interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists were conducted in Flanders, Belgium, from November 2015 to November 2016. Thematic analysis was applied to examine the transcripts in an iterative process.

Results: Four major themes arose in our body of data: (1) the patient as health manager, (2) health obsession and medicalization, (3) information management, and (4) shifting roles of the doctors and impact on the health care organization. Our research findings show a nuanced understanding of the potentials and pitfalls of different forms of self-tracking. The necessity of contextualization of self-tracking data and a professionalization of self-care through digital devices come to the fore as important overarching concepts.

Conclusions: This interview study with Belgian doctors examines the potentials and challenges of self-monitoring while focusing on the everyday professional experience of the physician. The dialogue between our dataset and the existing literature affords a fine-grained image of digital self-care and its current meaning in a medical-professional landscape.

Citing Articles

Patient-Generated Data as Interventions in Doctor-Patient Relationships? Negotiating (Un)Invited Participation in Medical Consultations.

Augst A, Lammerhirt D, Schubert C Sociol Health Illn. 2024; 47(2):e13864.

PMID: 39540662 PMC: 11851048. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13864.

Healthiness as a Virtue: The Healthism of mHealth and the Challenges to Public Health.

Wieczorek M, Rossmaier L Public Health Ethics. 2024; 16(3):219-231.

PMID: 38333766 PMC: 10849162. DOI: 10.1093/phe/phad019.

The roots of (in)equity in precision medicine: gaps in the discourse.

Green S, Prainsack B, Sabatello M Per Med. 2023; 21(1):5-9.

PMID: 38088178 PMC: 10784620. DOI: 10.2217/pme-2023-0097.

Data as symptom: Doctors' responses to patient-provided data in general practice.

Haase C, Ajjawi R, Bearman M, Brandt Brodersen J, Risor T, Hoeyer K Soc Stud Sci. 2023; 53(4):522-544.

PMID: 37096688 PMC: 10363926. DOI: 10.1177/03063127231164345.

Conflicting Aims and Values in the Application of Smart Sensors in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Ethical Analysis.

Predel C, Timmermann C, Ursin F, Orzechowski M, Ropinski T, Steger F JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(6):e32910.

PMID: 35737429 PMC: 9264133. DOI: 10.2196/32910.

References

McConnell M, Shcherbina A, Pavlovic A, Homburger J, Goldfeder R, Waggot D . Feasibility of Obtaining Measures of Lifestyle From a Smartphone App: The MyHeart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2016; 2(1):67-76. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4395. View

Godfrey C, Harrison M, Lysaght R, Lamb M, Graham I, Oakley P . Care of self - care by other - care of other: the meaning of self-care from research, practice, policy and industry perspectives. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011; 9(1):3-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00196.x. View

Tomlinson M, Rotheram-Borus M, Swartz L, Tsai A . Scaling up mHealth: where is the evidence?. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(2):e1001382. PMC: 3570540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001382. View

Swinburn B, Sacks G, Hall K, McPherson K, Finegood D, Moodie M . The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011; 378(9793):804-14. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60813-1. View

Piwek L, Ellis D, Andrews S, Joinson A . The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers. PLoS Med. 2016; 13(2):e1001953. PMC: 4737495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953. View

Parens E . On good and bad forms of medicalization. Bioethics. 2011; 27(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01885.x. View

Vogt H, Hofmann B, Getz L . The new holism: P4 systems medicine and the medicalization of health and life itself. Med Health Care Philos. 2016; 19(2):307-23. PMC: 4880637. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-016-9683-8. View

Jakicic J, Davis K, Rogers R, King W, Marcus M, Helsel D . Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016; 316(11):1161-1171. PMC: 5480209. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.12858. View

Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J . Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 48(2):177-87. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00032-0. View

10.

Kielmann T, Huby G, Powell A, Sheikh A, Price D, Williams S . From support to boundary: a qualitative study of the border between self-care and professional care. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 79(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.015. View

11.

Thille P, Ward N, Russell G . Self-management support in primary care: enactments, disruptions, and conversational consequences. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 108:97-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.041. View

12.

Azevedo A, de Sousa H, Monteiro J, Lima A . Future perspectives of Smartphone applications for rheumatic diseases self-management. Rheumatol Int. 2014; 35(3):419-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-014-3117-9. View

13.

Ancker J, Witteman H, Hafeez B, Provencher T, Van de Graaf M, Wei E . "You Get Reminded You're a Sick Person": Personal Data Tracking and Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(8):e202. PMC: 4642375. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4209. View

14.

De Backere F, Ongenae F, Vannieuwenborg F, Van Ooteghem J, Duysburgh P, Jansen A . The OCareCloudS project: Toward organizing care through trusted cloud services. Inform Health Soc Care. 2014; 41(2):159-76. DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2014.965306. View

15.

Dedding C, van Doorn R, Winkler L, Reis R . How will e-health affect patient participation in the clinic? A review of e-health studies and the current evidence for changes in the relationship between medical professionals and patients. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 72(1):49-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.017. View

16.

Gibbons M . Use of health information technology among racial and ethnic underserved communities. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011; 8:1f. PMC: 3035830. View

17.

Gerkens S, Merkur S . Belgium: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011; 12(5):1-266, xxv. View

18.

Or C, Tao D . Does the use of consumer health information technology improve outcomes in the patient self-management of diabetes? A meta-analysis and narrative review of randomized controlled trials. Int J Med Inform. 2014; 83(5):320-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.009. View

19.

Joseph K . The Matthew effect in health development. BMJ. 1989; 298(6686):1497-8. PMC: 1836728. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.298.6686.1497. View