» Articles » PMID: 29329558

Quality of Life and Problems Associated with Obturators of Patients with Maxillectomies

Overview
Journal Head Face Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Jan 14
PMID 29329558
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Maxillary defects predispose patients to different undesirable effects. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life (QoL) of patients with maxillary defects (acquired/congenital) wearing obturators.

Methods: The study comprised 30 patients aged between 16 and 78 years. Interviews were conducted to collect information pertaining to patients; sociodemographic, self-reported function of obturator using Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), self-evaluation of general health using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), radiotherapy treatment, salivary gland removal, reconstructive surgery, neck dissection and length of time obturators were worn. Clinical examination included type of maxillectomy, Aramany classification of the defect, and evaluation of obturator function using the Kapur retention and stability scoring system.

Result: Quality of life was affected significantly by marital status (P = 0.026). Married patients had better quality of life 61.3%, followed by divorced patients 38.8%, widowed 37.3% and the least QoL was detected in single patients 36.5%. Significant association between the type of maxillectomy and QoL was detected (P = 0.002). Retention of obturator prosthesis had a highly significant association with QoL (P < 0.001). Type of maxillectomy had a significant relation with obturator retention (P = 0.005). Stability had a significant correlation with QoL (P = 0.022). Obturator wearers who were treated with radiotherapy had lower QoL than those who were not treated with radiotherapy.

Conclusion: Rehabilitation of patients with maxillary defects using obturator prosthesis is an appropriate and not invasive treatment modality. Results support that good obturators contribute to a better life quality.

Citing Articles

Prosthetic rehabilitation of a hemimaxillectomy patient using a zygomatic - Corticobasal® implant- supported reconstructive prosthesis: A case report.

Akifuddin S, Awadalkreem F Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025; 127:110815.

PMID: 39778501 PMC: 11763205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.110815.


Retention of implant retained obturator using two implant placement configurations for maxillectomy cases: in-vitro study.

Aboseada N, Mohamed F, El-Shabrawy S BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1059.

PMID: 39256714 PMC: 11389338. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04797-3.


Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with maxillary oncology defects using zygomatic implants.

Mathevosyan D, Hovhannisyan S, Mashinyan K, Khachatryan L, Badalyan A, Hakobyan G Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):31.

PMID: 38856842 PMC: 11164848. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00545-y.


Validation of the "obturator functioning scale" for Chinese-speaking patients with obturator prostheses after cancer-related maxillectomy.

Shang J, Tian Y, Xu Z, Liu X, Cao Y, Sui L Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31071.

PMID: 38803891 PMC: 11128901. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31071.


Publications in Plastic Surgery and Reconstruction: A Review from a Developing Country, Sudan.

Bakhiet M, Alshareef A, Abuelnour A, Asiri M, Alzahrani R, Alghamdi S Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(5):e5761.

PMID: 38706466 PMC: 11068127. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005761.


References
1.
Kumar P, Alvi H, Rao J, Singh B, Jurel S, Kumar L . Assessment of the quality of life in maxillectomy patients: A longitudinal study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5(1):29-35. PMC: 3597923. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.29. View

2.
Irish J, Sandhu N, Simpson C, Wood R, Gilbert R, Gullane P . Quality of life in patients with maxillectomy prostheses. Head Neck. 2009; 31(6):813-21. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21042. View

3.
Ono T, Kohda H, Hori K, Nokubi T . Masticatory performance in postmaxillectomy patients with edentulous maxillae fitted with obturator prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20(2):145-50. View

4.
Umino S, Masuda G, Ono S, Fujita K . Speech intelligibility following maxillectomy with and without a prosthesis: an analysis of 54 cases. J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25(2):153-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00238.x. View

5.
Lethaus B, Lie N, de Beer F, Kessler P, de Baat C, Verdonck H . Surgical and prosthetic reconsiderations in patients with maxillectomy. J Oral Rehabil. 2009; 37(2):138-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02031.x. View