» Articles » PMID: 29313819

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of WATCHMAN LAA Closure at One Year in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: Results of the DAPT Subgroup from the EWOLUTION All-comers Study

Overview
Date 2018 Jan 10
PMID 29313819
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The study aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of WATCHMAN LAA closure in atrial fibrillation patients unsuitable for oral anticoagulation.

Methods And Results: The EWOLUTION registry prospectively collects all clinical data on 1,005 European patients implanted with a WATCHMAN device. Following the procedure, 605 patients (60.2%) received dual antiplatelet therapy according to the local standard; DAPT was discontinued in 85% of patients within one year. CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.61.6 and 2.41.2, respectively. The periprocedural SAE rate was 3.3% (2.0% major adverse cardiac events), mostly resolving without sequelae. Device embolisation or pericardial effusion occurred in one (0.2%) and two (0.3%) patients, respectively. TEE (median 62 days post implant, IQR: 47-97) confirmed effective sealing (no leak >5 mm) in 99.2% of patients. Device thrombus was present in 22 patients (4.0%), one patient developed a stroke. One-year mortality in the DAPT group was 9.6% (N=58) reflecting the advanced age and comorbidities in this population. The ischaemic stroke rate at one year was 1.4% (expected based on CHA2DS2-VASc: 7.5%), none fatal. The major bleeding rate was 2.5%, or 2.1% excluding periprocedural events (expected rate on VKA based on HAS-BLED: 5.1%).

Conclusions: LAA closure with the WATCHMAN device followed by DAPT therapy in a high-risk patient population is safe. At one year, the intervention is associated with a substantial risk reduction regarding ischaemic stroke and major bleeding compared to the expected rate based on CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.

Citing Articles

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Expanding Indications and New Developments.

Reed G, Nakhla S, Miyasaka R, Harb S, Kanj M, Wazni O Struct Heart. 2025; 9(1):100354.

PMID: 40017832 PMC: 11864148. DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100354.


Short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in cancer patients.

Tinoco M, Echarte-Morales J, Guerreiro C, Avila Gil E, Caneiro-Queija B, Barreiro-Perez M Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025; 56():101585.

PMID: 39830733 PMC: 11742620. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101585.


Timely Transesophageal Echocardiography After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion May Avoid Delayed Detection of Device-Related Thrombus.

Abugrin M, Panchal A, Aboulqassim B, Bilal M, Virk J CASE (Phila). 2024; 8(9):456-460.

PMID: 39483744 PMC: 11523204. DOI: 10.1016/j.case.2024.05.007.


Watchman vs. Amulet for Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Frazzetto M, Sanfilippo C, Costa G, Contrafatto C, Giacalone C, Scandura S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200792 PMC: 11355803. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164651.


Incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman device.

Maksym J, Scislo P, Kaplon-Cieslicka A, Huczek Z, Marchel M, Kochman J Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024; 20(2):164-171.

PMID: 39022721 PMC: 11249867. DOI: 10.5114/aic.2024.140315.