» Articles » PMID: 29312844

New Insights in the Treatment of Acromioclavicular Separation

Overview
Journal World J Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Jan 10
PMID 29312844
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A direct force on the superior aspect of the shoulder may cause acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation or separation. Severe dislocations can lead to chronic impairment, especially in the athlete and high-demand manual laborer. The dislocation is classified according to Rockwood. Types I and II are treated nonoperatively, while types IV, V and VI are generally treated operatively. Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment of type III dislocations in the high-demand patient. Recent evidence suggests that these should be treated nonoperatively initially. Classic surgical techniques were associated with high complication rates, including recurrent dislocations and hardware breakage. In recent years, many new techniques have been introduced in order to improve the outcomes. Arthroscopic reconstruction or repair techniques have promising short-term results. This article aims to provide a current concepts review on the treatment of AC dislocations with emphasis on recent developments.

Citing Articles

Superior suspensory complex of the shoulder reconstruction for acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: the Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research 3-tunnel technique.

Ingoe H, Maharaj J, Singh N, Stalin K, Italia K, Pareyon R JSES Int. 2025; 9(1):31-39.

PMID: 39898227 PMC: 11784502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.004.


Functional Outcomes of the Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation With a Clavicle Hook Plate: A Retrospective Study.

Mannan M, Afridi A, Ahmed K, Eisha S, Mazari M Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73898.

PMID: 39697928 PMC: 11653421. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73898.


What are our patients asking Google about acromioclavicular joint injuries?-frequently asked online questions and the quality of online resources.

Obana K, Lind D, Mastroianni M, Rondon A, Alexander F, Levine W JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024; 4(2):175-181.

PMID: 38706686 PMC: 11065754. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.02.001.


Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a novel surgical technique for acromioclavicular joint reduction with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction and anatomic conoid ligament reconstruction.

Navarro R, Kody M, Chapek M, Combs K JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024; 4(2):213-221.

PMID: 38706662 PMC: 11065762. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.12.001.


Concomitant Glenohumeral Pathologies in Patients with Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: How Do Acute and Chronic Instabilities Differ?.

Vetter P, Massih M, Bellmann F, Eckl L, Moroder P, Lazaridou A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541948 PMC: 10971087. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061723.


References
1.
Struhl S, Wolfson T . Continuous Loop Double Endobutton Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(10):2437-44. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515596409. View

2.
Dawson P, Adamson G, Pink M, Kornswiet M, Lin S, Shankwiler J . Relative contribution of acromioclavicular joint capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments to acromioclavicular stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 18(2):237-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.08.003. View

3.
Scheibel M, Droschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N . Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(7):1507-16. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511399379. View

4.
Tauber M, Gordon K, Koller H, Fox M, Resch H . Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 37(1):181-90. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508323255. View

5.
Metzlaff S, Rosslenbroich S, Forkel P, Schliemann B, Arshad H, Raschke M . Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 24(6):1972-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3294-9. View