» Articles » PMID: 29307077

Analysis of CT Features and Quantitative Texture Analysis in Patients with Thymic Tumors: Correlation with Grading and Staging

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Jan 8
PMID 29307077
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate potential relationship between qualitative CT features, quantitative texture analysis (QTA), histology, WHO staging, Masaoka classification and myasthenic syndrome in patients with thymic tumors.

Materials And Methods: Sixteen patients affected by histologically proven thymic tumors were retrospectively included in the study population. Clinical information, with special regard to myasthenic syndrome and serological positivity of anti-AchR antibodies, were recorded. Qualitative CT evaluation included the following parameters: (a) location; (b) tumor edges; (c) necrosis; (d) pleural effusion; (e) metastases; (f) chest wall infiltration; (g) tumor margins. QTA included evaluation of "Mean" (M), "Standard Deviation" (SD), "Kurtosis" (K), "Skewness" (S), "Entropy" (E), "Shape from Texture" (TX_sigma) and "average of positive pixels" (MPP). Pearson-Rho test was used to evaluate the relationship of continuous non-dichotomic parameters, whereas Mann-Whitney test was used for dichotomic parameters.

Results: Histological evaluation demonstrated thymoma in 12 cases and thymic carcinoma in 4 cases. Tumor necrosis was significantly correlated with QTA Mean (p = 0.0253), MPP (p = 0.0417), S (p = 0.0488) and K (p = 0.0178). WHO staging was correlated with Mean (p = 0.0193), SD (p = 0.0191) and MPP (p = 0.0195). Masaoka classification was correlated with Mean (p = 0.0322), MPP (p = 0.0315), skewness (p = 0.0433) and Kurtosis (p = 0.0083). Myasthenic syndrome was significantly associated with Mean (p = 0.0211) and MPP (p = 0.0261), whereas tumor size was correlated with Mean (p = 0.0241), entropy (p = 0.0177), MPP (p = 0.0468), skewness (p = 0.009) and Kurtosis (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates significant relationship between radiomics parameters, histology, grading and clinical manifestations of thymic tumors.

Citing Articles

Comparison of 2D and 3D radiomics features with conventional features based on contrast-enhanced CT images for preoperative prediction the risk of thymic epithelial tumors.

Yuan Y, Zhang H, Xu W, Dong D, Gao P, Zhang C Radiol Oncol. 2025; 59(1):69-78.

PMID: 40014788 PMC: 11867572. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2025-0016.


CT radiomics and human-machine hybrid system for differentiating mediastinal lymphomas from thymic epithelial tumors.

Xia H, Yu J, Nie K, Yang J, Zhu L, Zhang S Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):163.

PMID: 39609913 PMC: 11603948. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00808-2.


Possibility of Using Conventional Computed Tomography Features and Histogram Texture Analysis Parameters as Imaging Biomarkers for Preoperative Prediction of High-Risk Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach.

Jovanovic M, Stefanovic A, Sarac D, Kovac J, Jankovic A, Saponjski D Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(24).

PMID: 38136387 PMC: 10742259. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245840.


Development and validation of a deep learning radiomics nomogram for preoperatively differentiating thymic epithelial tumor histologic subtypes.

Chen X, Feng B, Xu K, Chen Y, Duan X, Jin Z Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(10):6804-6816.

PMID: 37148352 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09690-1.


Clinical radiomics-based machine learning versus three-dimension convolutional neural network analysis for differentiation of thymic epithelial tumors from other prevascular mediastinal tumors on chest computed tomography scan.

Chang C, Tang E, Wei Y, Lin C, Wu F, Wu M Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1105100.

PMID: 37143945 PMC: 10151670. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1105100.


References
1.
Buettner R, Wolf J, Thomas R . Lessons learned from lung cancer genomics: the emerging concept of individualized diagnostics and treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(15):1858-65. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.9867. View

2.
Venuta F, Anile M, Diso D, Vitolo D, Rendina E, De Giacomo T . Thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009; 37(1):13-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.038. View

3.
Janssen M, Ollers M, van Stiphout R, Riedl R, van den Bogaard J, Buijsen J . Blood glucose level normalization and accurate timing improves the accuracy of PET-based treatment response predictions in rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2010; 95(2):203-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.021. View

4.
Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout R, Granton P . Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(4):441-6. PMC: 4533986. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036. View

5.
Prasanna P, Patel J, Partovi S, Madabhushi A, Tiwari P . Radiomic features from the peritumoral brain parenchyma on treatment-naïve multi-parametric MR imaging predict long versus short-term survival in glioblastoma multiforme: Preliminary findings. Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(10):4188-4197. PMC: 5403632. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4637-3. View