» Articles » PMID: 29306668

A Prognostic Model of Alzheimer's Disease Relying on Multiple Longitudinal Measures and Time-to-event Data

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2018 Jan 8
PMID 29306668
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Characterizing progression in Alzheimer's disease is critically important for early detection and targeted treatment. The objective was to develop a prognostic model, based on multivariate longitudinal markers, for predicting progression-free survival in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Methods: The information contained in multiple longitudinal markers was extracted using multivariate functional principal components analysis and used as predictors in the Cox regression models. Cross-validation was used for selecting the best model based on Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative-1. External validation was conducted on Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative-2.

Results: Model comparison yielded a prognostic index computed as the weighted combination of historical information of five neurocognitive longitudinal markers that are routinely collected in observational studies. The comprehensive validity analysis provided solid evidence of the usefulness of the model for predicting Alzheimer's disease progression.

Discussion: The prognostic model was improved by incorporating multiple longitudinal markers. It is useful for monitoring disease and identifying patients for clinical trial recruitment.

Citing Articles

Neuroimaging techniques, gene therapy, and gut microbiota: frontier advances and integrated applications in Alzheimer's Disease research.

Wang H, Shi C, Jiang L, Liu X, Tang R, Tang M Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1485657.

PMID: 39691161 PMC: 11649678. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1485657.


The Potential of Disease Progression Modeling to Advance Clinical Development and Decision Making.

Starling M, Kehoe L, Burnett B, Green P, Venkatakrishnan K, Madabushi R Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024; 117(2):343-352.

PMID: 39410710 PMC: 11739755. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3467.


Deep learning model for individualized trajectory prediction of clinical outcomes in mild cognitive impairment.

Jung W, Kim S, Kim J, Jang H, Park C, Kim H Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1356745.

PMID: 38813529 PMC: 11135285. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1356745.


Predicting Alzheimer's Disease and Quantifying Asymmetric Degeneration of the Hippocampus Using Deep Learning of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Liu X, Li H, Fan Y Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2023; 2023.

PMID: 37790879 PMC: 10544795. DOI: 10.1109/isbi53787.2023.10230830.


Constructing a prognostic risk model for Alzheimer's disease based on ferroptosis.

Wang X, Zhai R, Li Z, Li H, Lei Y, Zhao F Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1168840.

PMID: 37181620 PMC: 10172508. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1168840.


References
1.
Li K, Chan W, Doody R, Quinn J, Luo S . Prediction of Conversion to Alzheimer's Disease with Longitudinal Measures and Time-To-Event Data. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 58(2):361-371. PMC: 5477671. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-161201. View

2.
Collins G, de Groot J, Dutton S, Omar O, Shanyinde M, Tajar A . External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:40. PMC: 3999945. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-40. View

3.
Shaw L, Vanderstichele H, Knapik-Czajka M, Clark C, Aisen P, Petersen R . Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects. Ann Neurol. 2009; 65(4):403-13. PMC: 2696350. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21610. View

4.
Li S, Okonkwo O, Albert M, Wang M . Variation in Variables that Predict Progression from MCI to AD Dementia over Duration of Follow-up. Am J Alzheimers Dis (Columbia). 2014; 2(1):12-28. PMC: 3919474. DOI: 10.7726/ajad.2013.1002. View

5.
Debray T, Vergouwe Y, Koffijberg H, Nieboer D, Steyerberg E, Moons K . A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 68(3):279-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.018. View