» Articles » PMID: 29300814

Body Mass Index and 20 Specific Cancers: Re-analyses of Dose-response Meta-analyses of Observational Studies

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Jan 5
PMID 29300814
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Objectives were to provide an overview and understand the strength of evidence and extent of potential biases and validity of claimed associations between body mass index (BMI) and risk of developing cancer.

Methods: We carried out an umbrella review and comprehensively re-analyzed the data of dose-response meta-analyses on associations between BMI and risk of 20 specific cancers (bladder, brain, breast, colonic, rectal, endometrial, gallbladder, gastric, leukemia, liver, lung, melanoma, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, esophagus, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, renal, thyroid) by adding big data or missed individual studies. Convincing evidence for an association was defined as a strong statistical significance in fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses at P < 0.001, 95% prediction interval (PI) excluded null, there was no large between-study heterogeneity and no small study effects. Suggestive evidence was defined as meeting the significance threshold for the random summary effects of P < 0.05, but 95% PI included the null. Weak evidence was defined as meeting the significance threshold for the random summary effects at a P < 0.05, but 95% PI included the null and there was large between-study heterogeneity or there were small study effects.

Results: Convincing evidence for an association with BMI was detectable for six cancers (leukemia, multiple myeloma, pancreatic, endometrial, rectal, and renal cell carcinoma). Suggestive evidence was detectable for malignant melanoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Weak evidence was detectable for brain and central nervous system tumors, breast, colon, gall bladder, lung, liver, ovarian, and thyroid cancer. No evidence was detectable for bladder, gastric, and prostate cancer.

Conclusions: The association of increased BMI and cancer is heterogeneous across cancer types. Leukemia, multiple myeloma, pancreatic, endometrial, rectal, and renal cell carcinoma are convincingly associated with an increased BMI by dose-response meta-analyses.

Citing Articles

Normal weight obesity, circulating biomarkers and risk of breast cancer: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

Wang W, Wang X, Jiang Y, Guo Y, Fu P, He W Br J Cancer. 2024; 132(2):203-211.

PMID: 39609539 PMC: 11747320. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02906-1.


Research progress on the correlation between obesity and the occurrence and development of kidney cancer: a narrative review.

Kang L, Chen X, Qi P, Ma Z, Han D, Zhang X Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(10):5678-5690.

PMID: 39525017 PMC: 11543094. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-744.


Lung cancer and obesity: A contentious relationship (Review).

Georgakopoulou V, Lempesis I, Trakas N, Sklapani P, He Y, Spandidos D Oncol Rep. 2024; 52(5).

PMID: 39497438 PMC: 11462394. DOI: 10.3892/or.2024.8817.


Association between weight-adjusted-waist index and gynecologic cancers: a population-based study.

Fang L, Li X, Fang Y, Wang Y, Wang R, Xie Y Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1449643.

PMID: 39346649 PMC: 11437532. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1449643.


Can patients with mild non-neoplastic lesions diagnosed at baseline screening be safely exempt from surveillance: evidence from multicenter community-based cohorts.

He S, Zhang Z, Song G, Wang Z, Dai C, Yan S Sci China Life Sci. 2024; 68(1):263-271.

PMID: 39254888 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2558-x.