» Articles » PMID: 29300328

The Human Exposure Potential from Propylene Releases to the Environment

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2018 Jan 5
PMID 29300328
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A detailed literature search was performed to assess the sources, magnitudes and extent of human inhalation exposure to propylene. Exposure evaluations were performed at both the community and occupational levels for those living or working in different environments. The results revealed a multitude of pyrogenic, biogenic and anthropogenic emission sources. Pyrogenic sources, including biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion, appear to be the primary contributors to atmospheric propylene. Despite a very short atmospheric lifetime, measurable levels could be detected in highly remote locations as a result of biogenic release. The indoor/outdoor ratio for propylene has been shown to range from about 2 to 3 in non-smoking homes, which indicates that residential sources may be the largest contributor to the overall exposure for those not occupationally exposed. In homes where smoking takes place, the levels may be up to thirty times higher than non-smoking residences. Atmospheric levels in most rural regions are typically below 2 ppbv, whereas the values in urban levels are much more variable ranging as high as 10 ppbv. Somewhat elevated propylene exposures may also occur in the workplace; especially for firefighters or refinery plant operators who may encounter levels up to about 10 ppmv.

Citing Articles

Heterologous Production of Isopropanol Using Metabolically Engineered Strains.

Hofele F, Schoch T, Oberlies C, Durre P Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 38135972 PMC: 10741115. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10121381.


Development of nanotechnology for advancement and application in wound healing: a review.

Bhattacharya D, Ghosh B, Mukhopadhyay M IET Nanobiotechnol. 2019; 13(8):778-785.

PMID: 31625517 PMC: 8676206. DOI: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2018.5312.

References
1.
Bogner J, Chanton J, Blake D, Abichou T, Powelson D . Effectiveness of a Florida landfill biocover for reduction of CH4 and NMHC emissions. Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44(4):1197-203. DOI: 10.1021/es901796k. View

2.
Mochalski P, King J, Klieber M, Unterkofler K, Hinterhuber H, Baumann M . Blood and breath levels of selected volatile organic compounds in healthy volunteers. Analyst. 2013; 138(7):2134-45. PMC: 4909136. DOI: 10.1039/c3an36756h. View

3.
Van Winkle M, Scheff P . Volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and elements in the air of ten urban homes. Indoor Air. 2001; 11(1):49-64. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.011001049.x. View

4.
Myers J, Phillips T, Grant R . Emissions and ambient air monitoring trends of lower olefins across Texas from 2002 to 2012. Chem Biol Interact. 2015; 241:2-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.02.008. View

5.
Liu C, Zhang C, Mu Y, Liu J, Zhang Y . Emission of volatile organic compounds from domestic coal stove with the actual alternation of flaming and smoldering combustion processes. Environ Pollut. 2016; 221:385-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.089. View