» Articles » PMID: 29295218

Eliciting the Intension of Drug Value Sets - Principles and Quality Assurance Applications

Overview
Publisher IOS Press
Date 2018 Jan 4
PMID 29295218
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Value sets (VSs) used in electronic clinical quality measures are lists of codes from standard terminologies ("extensional" VSs), whose purpose ("intension") is not always explicitly stated. We elicited the intension for the 09/01/2014 release of extensional medication value sets by comparison to drug classes from the October 2014 release of RxClass. Value sets matched drug classes if they shared common ingredients, as evidenced by Jaccard similarity score. We elicited the intension of 80 extensional value sets. The average Jaccard similarity was 0.65 for single classes and 0.80 for combination classes, with 34% (27/80) of the value sets having high similarity scores. Manual review by a pharmacist indicated 51% (41/80) of the drug classes selected as the best mapping for a value set matched the intension reflected in that value set name. This approach has the potential for facilitating the development and maintenance of medication value sets.

Citing Articles

Value sets and the problem of redundancy in value set repositories.

Gold S, Lehmann H, Schilling L, Lutters W PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0312289.

PMID: 39652546 PMC: 11627404. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312289.


Checklist and guidance on creating codelists for routinely collected health data research.

Matthewman J, Andresen K, Suffel A, Lin L, Schultze A, Tazare J NIHR Open Res. 2024; 4:20.

PMID: 39345273 PMC: 11437289. DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13550.2.


Rebuilding the Standing Prescription Renewal Orders.

Nelson S, Rector H, Brashear D, Mathe J, Wen H, English S Appl Clin Inform. 2019; 10(1):77-86.

PMID: 30699459 PMC: 6353649. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675813.

References
1.
Kern L, Malhotra S, Barron Y, Quaresimo J, Dhopeshwarkar R, Pichardo M . Accuracy of electronically reported "meaningful use" clinical quality measures: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(2):77-83. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-2-201301150-00001. View

2.
Brown S, Elkin P, Rosenbloom S, Husser C, Bauer B, Lincoln M . VA National Drug File Reference Terminology: a cross-institutional content coverage study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 1):477-81. View

3.
Winnenburg R, Bodenreider O . Metrics for assessing the quality of value sets in clinical quality measures. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014; 2013:1497-505. PMC: 3900160. View

4.
Tang P, Ralston M, Arrigotti M, Qureshi L, Graham J . Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 14(1):10-5. PMC: 2215069. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2198. View

5.
Chan K, Fowles J, Weiner J . Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2010; 67(5):503-27. DOI: 10.1177/1077558709359007. View