» Articles » PMID: 29293554

Very Young Infants Learn Abstract Rules in the Visual Modality

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Jan 3
PMID 29293554
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Abstracting the structure or 'rules' underlying observed patterns is central to mature cognition, yet research with infants suggests this far-reaching capacity is initially restricted to certain stimuli. Infants successfully abstract rules from auditory sequences (e.g., language), but fail when the same rules are presented as visual sequences (e.g., shapes). We propose that this apparent gap between rule learning in the auditory and visual modalities reflects the distinct requirements of the perceptual systems that interface with cognition: The auditory system efficiently extracts patterns from sequences structured in time, but the visual system best extracts patterns from sequences structured in space. Here, we provide the first evidence for this proposal with adults in an abstract rule learning task. We then reveal strong developmental continuity: infants as young as 3 months of age also successfully learn abstract rules in the visual modality when sequences are structured in space. This provides the earliest evidence to date of abstract rule learning in any modality.

Citing Articles

The developmental cognitive mechanism of learning algebraic rules from the dual-process theory perspective.

Xiao F, Liang K, Sun T, He F Psych J. 2024; 13(4):517-526.

PMID: 38618751 PMC: 11317196. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.749.


Abstract representations of small sets in newborns.

Martin L, Marie J, Brun M, de Hevia M, Streri A, Izard V Cognition. 2022; 226:105184.

PMID: 35671541 PMC: 9289748. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105184.


Seven-month-old infants detect symmetrical structures in multi-featured abstract visual patterns.

de la Cruz-Pavia I, Westphal-Fitch G, Fitch W, Gervain J PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0266938.

PMID: 35544459 PMC: 9094521. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266938.


From social contingency to verbal reference: A constructivist hypothesis.

Luchkina E, Xu F Psychol Rev. 2021; 129(4):890-909.

PMID: 34370496 PMC: 10312134. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000320.


Experience with research paradigms relates to infants' direction of preference.

Santolin C, Garcia-Castro G, Zettersten M, Sebastian-Galles N, Saffran J Infancy. 2020; 26(1):39-46.

PMID: 33111438 PMC: 7770082. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12372.


References
1.
Bulf H, Brenna V, Valenza E, Johnson S, Turati C . Many faces, one rule: the role of perceptual expertise in infants' sequential rule learning. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1595. PMC: 4612650. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01595. View

2.
Pinker S . Rules of language. Science. 1991; 253(5019):530-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1857983. View

3.
Saffran J, Pollak S, Seibel R, Shkolnik A . Dog is a dog is a dog: infant rule learning is not specific to language. Cognition. 2006; 105(3):669-80. PMC: 2066190. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.11.004. View

4.
Huang L, Pashler H . A Boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychol Rev. 2007; 114(3):599-631. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.599. View

5.
Ferry A, Hespos S, Waxman S . Categorization in 3- and 4-month-old infants: an advantage of words over tones. Child Dev. 2010; 81(2):472-9. PMC: 2910389. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01408.x. View