» Articles » PMID: 29290889

Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Residents on the Quality of Residency Training in the United States and Saudi Arabia

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2018 Jan 2
PMID 29290889
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We compare educational environments (i.e. physical, emotional and intellectual experiences) of emergency medicine (EM) residents training in the United States of America (USA) and Saudi Arabia (SA).

Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted using an adapted version of the validated Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) survey instrument from April 2015 through June 2016 to compare educational environments in all emergency medicine residency programs in SA and three selected programs in the USA with a history of training Saudi physicians. Overall scores were compared across programs, and for subscales (autonomy, teaching, and social Support), using chi-squared, -tests, and analysis of variance.

Results: A total of 219 surveys were returned for 260 residents across six programs (3 SA, 3 USA), with a response rate of 84%. Program-specific response rates varied from 79%-100%. All six residencies were qualitatively rated as "more positive than negative but room for improvement". Quantitative PHEEM scores for the USA programs were significantly higher: 118.7 compared to 109.9 for SA, =0.001. In subscales, perceptions of social support were not different between the two countries (=0.243); however, role autonomy (<0.001) and teaching (=0.005) were better in USA programs. There were no significant differences by post-graduate training year.

Conclusion: EM residents in all three emergency medicine residency programs in SA and the three USA programs studied perceive their training as high quality in general, but with room for improvements. USA residency programs scored higher in overall quality. This was driven by more favorable perceptions of role autonomy and teaching. Understanding how residents perceive their programs may help drive targeted quality improvement efforts.

Citing Articles

Knowledge and Attitudes of Saudi Medical Students about Emergency Management of Traumatic Dental Injuries.

Al-Haj Ali S, Farah R, Alhariqi S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21).

PMID: 36361130 PMC: 9654410. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114249.


Emergency medicine in Saudi Arabia: a century of progress and a bright vision for the future.

Khattab E, Sabbagh A, Aljerian N, Binsalleeh H, Almulhim M, Alqahtani A Int J Emerg Med. 2019; 12(1):16.

PMID: 31286863 PMC: 6615245. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-019-0232-0.

References
1.
Roff S, McAleer S, Skinner A . Development and validation of an instrument to measure the postgraduate clinical learning and teaching educational environment for hospital-based junior doctors in the UK. Med Teach. 2005; 27(4):326-31. DOI: 10.1080/01421590500150874. View

2.
Gilbert S, Wen L, Pines J . A comparison of perspectives on costs in emergency care among emergency department patients and residents. World J Emerg Med. 2017; 8(1):39-42. PMC: 5263034. DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.01.007. View

3.
Koutsogiannou P, Dimoliatis I, Mavridis D, Bellos S, Karathanos V, Jelastopulu E . Validation of the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) in a sample of 731 Greek residents. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8:734. PMC: 4666073. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1720-9. View

4.
Khoja A . Evaluation of the educational environment of the Saudi family medicine residency training program. J Family Community Med. 2015; 22(1):49-56. PMC: 4317995. DOI: 10.4103/2230-8229.149591. View

5.
Riquelme A, Herrera C, Aranis C, Oporto J, Padilla O . Psychometric analyses and internal consistency of the PHEEM questionnaire to measure the clinical learning environment in the clerkship of a Medical School in Chile. Med Teach. 2009; 31(6):e221-5. DOI: 10.1080/01421590902866226. View