» Articles » PMID: 29288121

Contemporary Incidence and Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastases

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Dec 31
PMID 29288121
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The incidence of localized prostate cancer has decreased with shifts in prostate cancer screening. While recent population based studies demonstrated a stable incidence of locoregional prostate cancer, they categorized organ confined, extraprostatic and lymph node positive disease together. However, to our knowledge the contemporary incidence of prostate cancer with pelvic lymph node metastases remains unknown.

Materials And Methods: We used SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) data from 2004 to 2014 to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer. We analyzed trends in the age standardized prostate cancer incidence by stage. The impact of disease extent on mortality was assessed by adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis.

Results: During the study period the annual incidence of nonmetastatic prostate cancer decreased from 5,119.1 to 2,931.9 per million men (IR 0.57, 95% CI 0.56-0.58, p <0.01) while the incidence of pelvic lymph node metastases increased from 54.1 to 79.5 per million men (IR 1.47, 95% CI 1.33-1.62, p <0.01). The incidence of distant metastases in men 75 years old or older reached a nadir in 2011 compared to 2004 (IR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.90, p <0.01) and it increased in 2012 compared to 2011 (IR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.24, p <0.05). The risk of cancer specific mortality significantly increased in men diagnosed with pelvic lymph node metastases (HR 4.5, 95% CI 4.2-4.9, p <0.01) and distant metastases (HR 21.9, 95% CI 21.2-22.7, p <0.01) compared to men with nonmetastatic disease.

Conclusions: The incidence of pelvic lymph node metastases is increasing coincident with a decline in the detection of localized disease. Whether this portends an increase in the burden of advanced disease or simply reflects decreased lead time remains unclear. However, this should be monitored closely as the increase in N1 disease reflects an increase in incurable prostate cancer at diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Current status and therapeutic value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Morizane S, Takenaka A Prostate Int. 2025; 12(3):117-127.

PMID: 39816936 PMC: 11733762. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.002.


Pelvis Or Involved Node Treatment: Eradicating Recurrence in Prostate Cancer (POINTER-PC) - study protocol paper for a phase III multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.

Slevin F, Alexander S, Brown S, Carter M, Choudhury A, Clipson A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e095560.

PMID: 39725427 PMC: 11683931. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095560.


Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy.

Challis B, Kneebone A, Eade T, Guo L, Atyeo J, Brown C Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024; 50:100896.

PMID: 39676999 PMC: 11638620. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100896.


Evaluation of complications and biochemical recurrence rates after (super) extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy.

Baas D, Israel B, de Baaij J, Vrijhof H, Hoekstra R, Kusters-Vandevelde H World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):605.

PMID: 39476127 PMC: 11525387. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05321-6.


The Influence of Disparities on Prostate Cancer at Diagnosis in the Charlotte Metropolitan Area.

Holland A, Wilson H, Gambill B, Lorenz W, Salvino M, Rose M Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(12):8394-8404.

PMID: 39080130 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15675-1.


References
1.
Messing E, Manola J, Sarosdy M, Wilding G, Crawford E, Trump D . Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(24):1781-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199912093412401. View

2.
Cheng L, Zincke H, Blute M, Bergstralh E, Scherer B, Bostwick D . Risk of prostate carcinoma death in patients with lymph node metastasis. Cancer. 2001; 91(1):66-73. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<66::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-p. View

3.
Freedland S, Aronson W, Kane C, Presti Jr J, Amling C, Elashoff D . Impact of obesity on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a report by the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database study group. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 22(3):446-53. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.181. View

4.
Hu J, Prasad S, Gu X, Williams S, Lipsitz S, Nguyen P . Determinants of performing radical prostatectomy pelvic lymph node dissection and the number of lymph nodes removed in elderly men. Urology. 2010; 77(2):402-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.015. View

5.
Prasad S, Gu X, Lipsitz S, Nguyen P, Hu J . Inappropriate utilization of radiographic imaging in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer in the United States. Cancer. 2011; 118(5):1260-7. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26416. View