Validation and Comparison of Force Fields for Native Cyclodextrins in Aqueous Solution

Molecular dynamics simulations of native α-, β-, and γ-cyclodextrin in aqueous solution have been conducted with the goal to investigate the performance of the CHARMM36 force field, the AMBER-compatible q4md-CD force field, and five variants of the GROMOS force field. The properties analyzed are structural parameters derived from X-ray diffraction and NMR experiments as well as hydrogen bonds and hydration patterns, including hydration free enthalpies. Recent revisions of the torsional-angle parameters for carbohydrate systems within the GROMOS family of force fields lead to a significant improvement of the agreement between simulated and experimental NMR data. Therefore, we recommend using the variant 53A6 instead of 53A6 and 56A6 or 2016H66 instead of 56A6 to simulate cyclodextrins in solution. The CHARMM36 and q4md-CD force fields show a similar performance as the three recommended GROMOS parameter sets. A significant difference is the more flexible nature of the cyclodextrins modeled with the CHARMM36 and q4md-CD force fields compared to the three recommended GROMOS parameter sets.