» Articles » PMID: 29287021

Does Computed Tomography Have the Ability to Differentiate Aggressive From Nonaggressive Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm?

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Dec 30
PMID 29287021
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the ability of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to differentiate aggressive from nonaggressive solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs).

Materials And Methods: Forty treatment-naive patients with pathologically proven pancreatic SPNs were included. Imaging characteristics were determined by consensus of 3 radiologists blinded to histopathologic aggressiveness. All patients underwent 4-phase CECT using a pancreatic protocol. The regions of interest of the tumor and the normal pancreas were documented on all phases. Lymph nodes were considered metastatic if greater than 1.0 cm in short-axis diameter.Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare between aggressive and nonaggressive tumors.

Results: No significant difference was noted between imaging covariates, such as internal hemorrhage, calcification, wall thickness perceptibility, vascular invasion, margins, cystic component, and pancreatic and biliary ductal dilation. Tumors with greater than 62.5 Hounsfield units and progressive enhancement during the delayed phase had aggressive characteristics (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: On delayed phase CECT, pathologically aggressive SPNs may show greater enhancement than nonaggressive SPNs.

Citing Articles

Analysis of invasiveness and tumor-associated macrophages infiltration in solid pseudopapillary tumors of pancreas.

Yang J, Tan C, Long D, Liang Y, Zhou L, Liu X World J Gastroenterol. 2022; 28(34):5047-5057.

PMID: 36160642 PMC: 9494934. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i34.5047.


Clinical characteristics, surgical strategies, and outcome of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: retrospective analysis in a single center.

Zhang W, Qiu J, Bian W, Sun D, Shi Y, Qin L Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022; 17(1):163-169.

PMID: 35251402 PMC: 8886464. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.108804.


Surgical Resection of 78 Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors: a 30-Year Single Institutional Experience.

Wright M, Javed A, Saunders T, Zhu Y, Burkhart R, Yu J J Gastrointest Surg. 2019; 24(4):874-881.

PMID: 31073801 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04252-7.


Prediction of malignancy and adverse outcome of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas.

You L, Yang F, Fu D World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018; 10(7):184-193.

PMID: 30079144 PMC: 6068856. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i7.184.

References
1.
Guo N, Zhou Q, Chen R, Zou S, Li Z, Lin Q . Diagnosis and surgical treatment of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: analysis of 24 cases. Can J Surg. 2011; 54(6):368-74. PMC: 3238340. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.011810. View

2.
Adams A, Siegal G, Jhala N . Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a review of salient clinical and pathologic features. Adv Anat Pathol. 2007; 15(1):39-45. DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31815e5237. View

3.
Kang C, Kim K, Choi J, Kim H, Lee W, Kim B . Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas suggesting malignant potential. Pancreas. 2006; 32(3):276-80. DOI: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000202956.41106.8a. View

4.
Chae S, Lee J, Baek J, Shin C, Yoo M, Yoon J . Magnetic resonance imaging spectrum of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014; 38(2):249-57. DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000445639.26581.65. View

5.
Machado M, Machado M, Bacchella T, Jukemura J, Almeida J, Cunha J . Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: distinct patterns of onset, diagnosis, and prognosis for male versus female patients. Surgery. 2007; 143(1):29-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.030. View