» Articles » PMID: 29284450

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation of Heart Valve Disease

Overview
Journal BMC Med Imaging
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Dec 30
PMID 29284450
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over the last 25 years, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as an alternative to echocardiography for assessment of valvular heart disease (VHD). Although echo remains the first-line imaging modality for the assessment of patients with VHD, CMR can now provide a comprehensive assessment in many instances. Using a combination of techniques, CMR provides information on valve anatomy and enables quantitative analysis of the severity of the valve lesion.

Main Text: In this review, the fundamentals of CMR in assessment of VHD are described, together with its strengths and weaknesses. We detail the utility of CMR for studying all aspects of VHD, including valve anatomy, flow quantification as well as ventricular volumes and function. The optimisation of CMR for evaluating the commonest valve lesions (aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis) as well as in right-sided VHD and prosthetic valves is summarised. The focus of this review is to enable the reader to optimise the use of CMR in his or her own evaluation of heart valve lesions in clinical practice.

Conclusions: CMR can be used for the comprehensive evaluation of VHD. This exciting, non-invasive imaging modality is likely to have increasing utility in the clinical evaluation of patients with VHD.

Citing Articles

Atrial Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management Strategies.

Mohyeldin M, Abdelghafar A, Allu S, Shrivastava S, Mustafa A, Mohamed F Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 25(12):435.

PMID: 39742228 PMC: 11683701. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2512435.


Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with mitral valve prolapse.

Figliozzi S, Di Maio S, Georgiopoulos G, Vandenberk B, Chiribiri A, Francone M J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024; 27(1):101137.

PMID: 39725235 PMC: 11786644. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101137.


Novel contouring method for optimizing MRI flow quantification in patients with aortic valve disease.

Yaman M, Chetrit M, Bullen J, Bolen M, Flamm S, Kwon D Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 40(3):665-673.

PMID: 38286950 PMC: 10950979. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-023-03036-0.


Assessment of Microvascular Disease in Heart and Brain by MRI: Application in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.

Bennett J, van Dinther M, Voorter P, Backes W, Barnes J, Barkhof F Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(9).

PMID: 37763715 PMC: 10534635. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091596.


Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Disease in Athletes.

Segreti A, Celeski M, Monticelli L, Perillo A, Crispino S, Di Gioia G J Clin Med. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37240669 PMC: 10219091. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103562.


References
1.
Andersson C, Kihlberg J, Ebbers T, Lindstrom L, Carlhall C, Engvall J . Phase-contrast MRI volume flow--a comparison of breath held and navigator based acquisitions. BMC Med Imaging. 2016; 16:26. PMC: 4809032. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0128-x. View

2.
Nishimura R, Otto C, Bonow R, Carabello B, Erwin 3rd J, Guyton R . 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(22):2438-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537. View

3.
Carabello B . Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(9):677-82. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp010846. View

4.
Shellock F . MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a compilation of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 151(4):811-4. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.4.811. View

5.
Myerson S, dArcy J, Mohiaddin R, Greenwood J, Karamitsos T, Francis J . Aortic regurgitation quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: association with clinical outcome. Circulation. 2012; 126(12):1452-60. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.083600. View