The Management of Rectal Bleeding Following Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Review of the Current Literature

Overview

Journal Can Urol Assoc J

Specialty Urology

Date 2017 Dec 29

PMID 29283091

Citations 8

Authors

Mark R Quinlan

Damien Bolton

Rowan G Casey

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Since the advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based testing, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy has become a standard part of the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PCa). Rectal bleeding is one of the common side effects of this transrectal route. While rectal bleeding is usually mild and self-limiting, it can be life-threatening. In this article, we examine rectal bleeding post-TRUS-guided prostate biopsy and explore the literature to evaluate techniques and strategies aimed at preventing and managing this common and important complication.

Methods: A PubMed literature search was carried out using the keywords "transrectal-prostate-biopsy-bleed." A search of the bibliography of reviewed studies was also conducted. Additionally, papers in non-PubMed-listed journals of which the authors were aware were appraised.

Results: Numerous modifiable risk factors for this bleeding complication exist, particularly anticoagulants/antiplatelets and the number of core biopsies taken. Successfully described corrective measures for such rectal bleeding include tamponade (digital/packs/catheter/tampon/condom), endoscopic sclerotherapy/banding/clipping, radiological embolization, and surgical intervention.

Conclusions: We advocate early consultation with the colorectal/gastroenterology and interventional radiology services and a progressive, stepwise approach to the management of post-biopsy rectal bleeding, starting with resuscitation and conservative tamponade measures, moving to endoscopic hemostasis ± radiological embolization ± transanal surgical methods. Given the infrequent but serious nature of major rectal bleeding after TRUS biopsy, we recommend the establishment of centralized databases or registries forthwith to prospectively capture such data. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive look specifically at the management of post-TRUS biopsy rectal bleeding.

Citing Articles

Presence of Portomesenteric Venous Gas and Pneumatosis Intestinalis in Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia as a Complication of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy.

Begum Ozturk N, Kutlu A, Iliaz R ACG Case Rep J. 2023; 10(12):e01226.

PMID: 38093785 PMC: 10718385. DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001226.

Targeting STEAP1 as an anticancer strategy.

Nakamura H, Arihara Y, Takada K Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1285661.

PMID: 37909017 PMC: 10613890. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1285661.

Hemorrhagic Shock After Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Successfully Treated With Endoscopic Therapy.

Dave N, Esmail Khan Ghasri R, Gonzalez H, Kaplan S ACG Case Rep J. 2023; 10(4):e01027.

PMID: 37073378 PMC: 10106163. DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001027.

Safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization for management of refractory hematuria of prostatic origin.

Zhang J, Wang Q, Zhao H, Yuan B, Sun X, Guan Y J Interv Med. 2022; 5(2):84-88.

PMID: 35936661 PMC: 9349008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimed.2022.03.005.

Delayed-onset bleeding after transrectal prostate biopsy presenting as a rectal Dieulafoy's lesion.

Saito M, Sudo G, Inoue H, Takada Y, Miura K, Yawata A Endoscopy. 2022; 54(S 02):E873-E874.

PMID: 35750083 PMC: 9735349. DOI: 10.1055/a-1858-4893.

References

Kaneko T, Suzuki T, Matsushita N, Yoshida I . [Transcatheter arterial embolization for bleeding of prostatic artery after prostate biopsy]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2003; 94(7):693-5. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.94.693. View

Ihezue C, Smart J, Dewbury K, Mehta R, Burgess L . Biopsy of the prostate guided by transrectal ultrasound: relation between warfarin use and incidence of bleeding complications. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60(4):459-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.10.014. View

Pisco J, Martins J, Correia M . Internal iliac artery: embolization to control hemorrhage from pelvic neoplasms. Radiology. 1989; 172(2):337-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.172.2.2748811. View

Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Dimitriadis G, Chatzimavroudis G, Zavos C, Pilpilidis I . Endoclipping treatment of life-threatening rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15(9):1130-3. PMC: 2655178. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.1130. View

Bilhim T, Pisco J, Rio Tinto H, Fernandes L, Pinheiro L, Duarte M . Unilateral versus bilateral prostatic arterial embolization for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate enlargement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 36(2):403-11. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0528-4. View

Maan Z, Cutting C, Patel U, Kerry S, Pietrzak P, Perry M . Morbidity of transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies in patients after the continued use of low-dose aspirin. BJU Int. 2003; 91(9):798-800. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04238.x. View

Burger W, Chemnitius J, Kneissl G, Rucker G . Low-dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention - cardiovascular risks after its perioperative withdrawal versus bleeding risks with its continuation - review and meta-analysis. J Intern Med. 2005; 257(5):399-414. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01477.x. View

Syed M, Chaudhry N, Shaikh A, Morar K, Mukerjee K, Damallie E . Catheter-directed middle hemorrhoidal artery embolization for life-threatening rectal bleeding. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007; 21(2):117-23. PMC: 2657672. DOI: 10.1155/2007/272641. View

Asano T, Kobayashi S, Yano M, Otsuka Y, Kitahara S . Continued administration of antithrombotic agents during transperineal prostate biopsy. Int Braz J Urol. 2015; 41(1):116-23. PMC: 4752064. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.16. View

10.

Sheikh M, Hussein A, Kehinde E, Al-Saeed O, Rad A, Ali Y . Patients' tolerance and early complications of transrectal sonographically guided prostate biopsy: prospective study of 300 patients. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005; 33(9):452-6. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20168. View

11.

Maatman T, Bigham D, Stirling B . Simplified management of post-prostate biopsy rectal bleeding. Urology. 2002; 60(3):508. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01772-7. View

12.

Bekarma H, Smart C . The use of a urinary catheter and rectal sponge to tamponade severe bleeding following TRUS prostate biopsy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014; 96(7):555. PMC: 4473455. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2014.96.7.555. View

13.

Ustundag Y, Yesilli C, Aydemir S, Savranlar A, Yazicioglu K . A life-threatening hematochesia after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy in a prostate cancer case presenting with lymphedema. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005; 36(3):397-400. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-004-8868-x. View

14.

Seymour M, Oesterling J . Anterior rectal wall hematoma: complication of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate. Urology. 1992; 39(2):177-81. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90279-6. View

15.

Ahmed H, Akin O, Coleman J, Crane S, Emberton M, Goldenberg L . Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2011; 109(11):1636-47. PMC: 3682487. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10633.x. View

16.

Brullet E, Guevara M, Campo R, Falco J, Puig J, Prera A . Massive rectal bleeding following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Endoscopy. 2000; 32(10):792-5. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-7709. View

17.

Kilciler M, Erdemir F, Demir E, Guven O, Avci A . The effect of rectal Foley catheterization on rectal bleeding rates after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008; 19(9):1344-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.06.005. View

18.

Meyer J, Gillatt D, Lush R, Persad R . Managing the warfarinized urological patient. BJU Int. 2003; 92(4):351-4. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04359.x. View

19.

Pacios E, Esteban J, Breton M, Alonso M, Sicilia-Urban J, Fidalgo M . Endoscopic treatment of massive rectal bleeding following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007; 41(6):561-2. DOI: 10.1080/00365590601116832. View

20.

Anjum M . Pelvic haematoma following trucut biopsy of the prostate. Int Urol Nephrol. 1996; 28(6):781-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02550727. View