» Articles » PMID: 29277493

Emergency Department Visits in Patients with Low Acuity Conditions: Factors Associated with Resource Utilization

Overview
Journal Am J Emerg Med
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2017 Dec 27
PMID 29277493
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To identify health beliefs of emergency department (ED) patients with low acuity conditions and how these affect ambulance (AMB) utilization.

Methods: We performed a prospective, observational study on a convenience sample of patients 18years or older, who presented to the ED of an urban, academic hospital with an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage level of 4 or 5. Demographics, treatment, and disposition data were obtained along with self-administered surveys. Characteristics of patients with low acuity conditions who presented to the ED by AMB were compared to the patients who came to the ED by private transportation (PT). Data were analyzed with the chi-square test, t-test, and Mann-Whitney test.

Results: A total of 197 patients (97 AMB and 100 PT) were enrolled. Compared to PT, AMB patients were more likely to: be insured (82% vs. 56%; p=0.000), have a primary care provider (62% vs. 44%; p=0.048), and lack a regular means of transportation (53% vs. 33%; p=0.005). Three surveys were used the SF-8, Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults [STOFHLA], and Health Belief Model [HBM]. Answers to HBM showed patients perceive that their illness required care within one hour of arrival (38% vs. 21%; p=0.04), have used an ambulance in the past year (76% vs. 33%; p=0.001) and to utilize an ambulance in the future for similar concerns (53% vs. 15%; p=0.000). AMB patients were more likely to call an ambulance for any health concern (p=0.035) and felt that there were enough ambulances for all patients in the city (p=0.01). There were no differences in age, employment, level of income and education, nor hospital admission rate between groups.

Conclusions: Ambulance use in low-acuity ED patients is associated with misperceptions regarding severity of illness and resource allocation as well as limited access to private transportation. Understanding patient perceptions of illness and other barriers to receiving care is imperative for the development of interventions aimed at enabling change in health behaviors such as the elective use of limited resources.

Citing Articles

Public Beliefs About Accessibility and Quality of Emergency Departments in Germany.

Klein J, Koens S, Scherer M, Strauss A, Harter M, von dem Knesebeck O West J Emerg Med. 2024; 25(3):389-398.

PMID: 38801046 PMC: 11112668. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.18224.


Assessment Tools for Measuring Health Literacy and Digital Health Literacy in a Hospital Setting: A Scoping Review.

Dijkman E, Ter Brake W, Drossaert C, Doggen C Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38200917 PMC: 10778720. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010011.


Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs.

Umgelter A, Faust M, Wenske S, Umgelter K, Schmid R, Walter G Int J Emerg Med. 2023; 16(1):64.

PMID: 37752441 PMC: 10523768. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-023-00542-9.


The impact of COVID-19 on an Irish Emergency Department (ED): a cross-sectional study exploring the factors influencing ED utilisation prior to and during the pandemic from the patient perspective.

Cummins N, Garavan C, Barry L, Devlin C, Corey G, Cummins F BMC Emerg Med. 2022; 22(1):176.

PMID: 36324084 PMC: 9628103. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00720-7.


Patient disposition using the Emergency Severity Index: a retrospective observational study at an interdisciplinary emergency department.

Volk S, Koedel U, Horster S, Bayer A, DHaese J, Pfister H BMJ Open. 2022; 12(5):e057684.

PMID: 35551090 PMC: 9109098. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057684.