» Articles » PMID: 29275493

Automatic Decision Support for Clinical Diagnostic Literature Using Link Analysis in a Weighted Keyword Network

Overview
Journal J Med Syst
Date 2017 Dec 25
PMID 29275493
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a novel approach to recommending articles from the medical literature that support clinical diagnostic decision-making, giving detailed descriptions of the associated ideas and principles. The specific goal is to retrieve biomedical articles that help answer questions of a specified type about a particular case. Based on the filtered keywords, MeSH(Medical Subject Headings) lexicon and the automatically extracted acronyms, the relationship between keywords and articles was built. The paper gives a detailed description of the process of by which keywords were measured and relevant articles identified based on link analysis in a weighted keywords network. Some important challenges identified in this study include the extraction of diagnosis-related keywords and a collection of valid sentences based on the keyword co-occurrence analysis and existing descriptions of symptoms. All data were taken from medical articles provided in the TREC (Text Retrieval Conference) clinical decision support track 2015. Ten standard topics and one demonstration topic were tested. In each case, a maximum of five articles with the highest relevance were returned. The total user satisfaction of 3.98 was 33% higher than average. The results also suggested that the smaller the number of results, the higher the average satisfaction. However, a few shortcomings were also revealed since medical literature recommendation for clinical diagnostic decision support is so complex a topic that it cannot be fully addressed through the semantic information carried solely by keywords in existing descriptions of symptoms. Nevertheless, the fact that these articles are actually relevant will no doubt inspire future research.

Citing Articles

An improved BM25 algorithm for clinical decision support in Precision Medicine based on co-word analysis and Cuckoo Search.

Zhang Z BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021; 21(1):81.

PMID: 33653325 PMC: 7927407. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01454-5.

References
1.
Shwe M, Middleton B, Heckerman D, Henrion M, Horvitz E, Lehmann H . Probabilistic diagnosis using a reformulation of the INTERNIST-1/QMR knowledge base. I. The probabilistic model and inference algorithms. Methods Inf Med. 1991; 30(4):241-55. View

2.
Wright A, Sittig D, Ash J, Feblowitz J, Meltzer S, McMullen C . Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18(3):232-42. PMC: 3078666. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000113. View

3.
Raja A, Ip I, Prevedello L, Sodickson A, Farkas C, Zane R . Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Radiology. 2011; 262(2):468-74. PMC: 3267081. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110951. View

4.
Hoeksema L, Bazzy-Asaad A, Lomotan E, Edmonds D, Ramirez-Garnica G, Shiffman R . Accuracy of a computerized clinical decision-support system for asthma assessment and management. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18(3):243-50. PMC: 3078658. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000063. View

5.
Elkin P, Liebow M, Bauer B, Chaliki S, Wahner-Roedler D, Bundrick J . The introduction of a diagnostic decision support system (DXplain™) into the workflow of a teaching hospital service can decrease the cost of service for diagnostically challenging Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs). Int J Med Inform. 2010; 79(11):772-7. PMC: 2977948. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.004. View