Workflow Interruptions and Stress Atwork: a Mixed-methods Study Among Physicians and Nurses of a Multidisciplinary Emergency Department

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2017 Dec 25

PMID 29275350

Citations 12

Authors

Matthias Weigl

Joana Beck

Markus Wehler

Anna Schneider

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Dealing with multiple workflow interruptions is a major challenge in emergency department (ED) work. This study aimed to establish a taxonomy of workflow interruptions that takes into account the content and purpose of interruptive communication. It further aimed to identify associations of workflow interruptions with ED professionals' work stress.

Design: Combined data from expert observation sessions and concomitant self-evaluations of ED providers.

Setting: ED of an academic community hospital in Germany.

Participants: Multidisciplinary sample of ED physicians and nurses. 77 matched observation sessions of interruptions and self-evaluations of work stress were obtained on 20 randomly selected days.

Outcome Measures: ED professionals' stress evaluations were based on standardised measures. ED workload data on patient load, patient acuity and staffing were included as control variables in regression analyses.

Results: Overall mean rate was 7.51 interruptions/hour. Interruptions were most frequently caused by ED colleagues of another profession (27.1%; mean interruptions/hour rate: 2.04), by ED colleagues of the same profession (24.1%; 1.81) and by telephone/beeper (21%; 1.57). Concerning the contents of interruption events, interruptions most frequently occurred referring to a parallel case under care (30.3%, 2.07), concerning the current case (19.1%; 1.28), or related to coordination activities (18.2%, 1.24). Regression analyses revealed that interruptive communication related to parallel cases significantly increased ED providers' stress levels (β=0.24, P=0.03). This association remained significant after controlling for ED workload.

Discussion: Interruptions that refer to parallel cases under care were associated with increased stress among ED physicians and nurses. Our approach to distinguish between sources and contents of interruptions contributes to an improved understanding of potential benefits and risks of workflow interruptions in ED work environments. Despite some limitations, our findings add to future research on the implications of interruptions for effective and safe patient care and work in complex and dynamic care environments.

Citing Articles

Psychosocial working conditions and violence prevention climate in German emergency departments - a cross-sectional study.

Reissmann S, Guliani M, Wirth T, Groneberg D, Harth V, Mache S BMC Emerg Med. 2025; 25(1):17.

PMID: 39849345 PMC: 11759433. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01155-y.

Situations and demands of central sterile supply department training on nursing interruptions.

Huang J, Yi L, Wu K, Chen Y, Hu R, Pan W BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):38.

PMID: 39773462 PMC: 11706008. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12190-7.

Medical student shadowing on hospital medicine direct-care services.

Aldrich D, Martin S J Hosp Med. 2024; 20(3):295-307.

PMID: 38977379 PMC: 11874241. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13460.

Flemish critical care nurses' experiences regarding the influence of work-related demands on their health: a descriptive interpretive qualitative study.

Billiau L, Bolliger L, Clays E, Eeckloo K, Ketels M BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):387.

PMID: 38844928 PMC: 11155134. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02032-6.

Surgical counting interruptions in operating rooms.

Lujun Z, Yuan G, Wei W BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):241.

PMID: 38600519 PMC: 11008047. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01912-1.

References

Weigl M, Muller A, Holland S, Wedel S, Woloshynowych M . Work conditions, mental workload and patient care quality: a multisource study in the emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 25(7):499-508. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003744. View

Jeanmonod R, Boyd M, Loewenthal M, Triner W . The nature of emergency department interruptions and their impact on patient satisfaction. Emerg Med J. 2010; 27(5):376-9. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.071134. View

Brixey J, Robinson D, Johnson C, Johnson T, Turley J, Zhang J . A concept analysis of the phenomenon interruption. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007; 30(1):E26-42. DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200701000-00012. View

Raban M, Walter S, Douglas H, Strumpman D, Mackenzie J, Westbrook J . Measuring the relationship between interruptions, multitasking and prescribing errors in an emergency department: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(10):e009076. PMC: 4606441. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009076. View

Berg L, Kallberg A, Ehrenberg A, Florin J, Ostergren J, Djarv T . Factors influencing clinicians' perceptions of interruptions as disturbing or non-disturbing: A qualitative study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016; 27:11-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2016.01.003. View

Tschan F, Seelandt J, Keller S, Semmer N, Kurmann A, Candinas D . Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(13):1718-25. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9927. View

Walter S, Li L, Dunsmuir W, Westbrook J . Managing competing demands through task-switching and multitasking: a multi-setting observational study of 200 clinicians over 1000 hours. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013; 23(3):231-41. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002097. View

Westbrook J, Woods A, Rob M, Dunsmuir W, Day R . Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(8):683-90. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65. View

Ernst A, Albers C . Regression assumptions in clinical psychology research practice-a systematic review of common misconceptions. PeerJ. 2017; 5:e3323. PMC: 5436580. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3323. View

10.

Tucker A, Spear S . Operational failures and interruptions in hospital nursing. Health Serv Res. 2006; 41(3 Pt 1):643-62. PMC: 1713207. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00502.x. View

11.

Wears R, Perry S . Human factors and ergonomics in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40(2):206-12. DOI: 10.1067/mem.2002.124900. View

12.

Cole G, Stefanus D, Gardner H, Levy M, Klein E . The impact of interruptions on the duration of nursing interventions: a direct observation study in an academic emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 25(6):457-65. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003683. View

13.

Myers R, McCarthy M, Whitlatch A, Parikh P . Differentiating between detrimental and beneficial interruptions: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 25(11):881-888. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004401. View

14.

Chisholm C, Weaver C, Whenmouth L, Giles B . A task analysis of emergency physician activities in academic and community settings. Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 58(2):117-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.11.026. View

15.

Chisholm C, Dornfeld A, Nelson D, Cordell W . Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38(2):146-51. DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.115440. View

16.

Grundgeiger T, Dekker S, Sanderson P, Brecknell B, Liu D, Aitken L . Obstacles to research on the effects of interruptions in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 25(6):392-5. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004083. View

17.

Arora S, Hull L, Sevdalis N, Tierney T, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M . Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room. Am J Surg. 2010; 199(1):60-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.036. View

18.

Werner N, Holden R . Interruptions in the wild: Development of a sociotechnical systems model of interruptions in the emergency department through a systematic review. Appl Ergon. 2015; 51:244-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.05.010. View

19.

Weigl M, Muller A, Vincent C, Angerer P, Sevdalis N . The association of workflow interruptions and hospital doctors' workload: a prospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 21(5):399-407. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000188. View

20.

Douglas H, Raban M, Walter S, Westbrook J . Improving our understanding of multi-tasking in healthcare: Drawing together the cognitive psychology and healthcare literature. Appl Ergon. 2016; 59(Pt A):45-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.021. View