» Articles » PMID: 29273076

Highly Conformal Combined Radiotherapy with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine for Treatment of Loco-regionally Advanced Cervical Cancer - a Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal Radiat Oncol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2017 Dec 24
PMID 29273076
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cisplatin and gemcitabine combined with conventional radiation therapy in the treatment of cervical cancer patients results in a favorable outcome but with excess toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity profile of dual chemotherapy and highly conformal external beam radiotherapy with image guided adaptive brachytherapy.

Methods: Seventeen patients with cervical carcinoma FIGO stage IB2-IIIB were treated with curative intent between 2011 and 2015. A total dose of 50.4 Gy was prescribed to the elective pelvic nodal volume. Patients with FDG-PET/CT positive lymph nodes (n = 15; 83.3%) received an additional boost to a total dose of 62 Gy. Chemotherapy prescription goals were: concomitant during 5 weeks of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) 40 mg/m2 cisplatin and 125 mg/m gemcitabine, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy from week 10 (2 cycles 50 mg/m cisplatin and 1000 mg/m gemcitabine). EBRT was followed by 3-4 fractions (6 Gy per fraction) of intrauterine image guided adaptive brachytherapy. Toxicities were graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v 4.0).

Results: One (6%) patient developed acute grade 3 diarrhea. We did not record any other acute or late gastrointestinal or urogenital toxicity higher that grade 3. Most common acute hematological toxicity was anemia grade 2 recorded in 10 (59%) patients. There was only one case of grade 3 neutropenia (6%). The number of patients that received the complete chemotherapy regimen was gradually declining during the course of therapy. From week 2 to 5, gemcitabine was omitted in 4 (24%),7 (41%), 8 (47%), and 12 (71%) patients respectively, similarly, cisplatin was omitted in 2 (12%),3 (18%),1 (6%) and 7 (41%) patients respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was omitted in 8 patients (47%). During a median follow-up time of 20 months (5 to 63 months) 6 (35%) patients developed disease relapse with 5 (29%) of them in the form of systemic disease.

Conclusions: In contrast to previous findings cisplatin and gemcitabine in combination with highly conformal radiation therapy seems to have an acceptable toxicity profile. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal dosage of the proposed therapy concept.

Citing Articles

Differential expressions of carcinoembryonic antigen and squamous cell carcinoma antigen in patients with advanced cervical cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Bai X, Liu B, Wu Y, Wu C, Zhao L, Wang L Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(10):11875-11882.

PMID: 34786117 PMC: 8581896.


Adjuvant Systemic Therapy after Chemoradiation and Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Horeweg N, Mittal P, Gradowska P, Boere I, Chopra S, Nout R Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(8).

PMID: 33919905 PMC: 8070970. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081880.


5-Nitro-2,4-Dichloropyrimidine as an Universal Model for Low-Energy Electron Processes Relevant for Radiosensitization.

Luxford T, Pshenichnyuk S, Asfandiarov N, Perecko T, Falk M, Kocisek J Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(21).

PMID: 33142925 PMC: 7662275. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218173.


Tolerability, Efficacy and Feasibility of Concurrent Gemcitabine and Cisplatin (CGP) Combined With Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Loco-Regionally Advanced Carcinoma of the Cervix.

Drokow E, Zi L, Qian H, Xu L, Foli F, Ahmed H J Cancer. 2020; 11(9):2632-2638.

PMID: 32201533 PMC: 7066008. DOI: 10.7150/jca.40276.

References
1.
Kidd E, Siegel B, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Mutch D, Powell M . Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(12):2108-13. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4151. View

2.
Lawrence T, Eisbruch A, Shewach D . Gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization. Semin Oncol. 1997; 24(2 Suppl 7):S7-24-S7-28. View

3.
Grigsby P, Siegel B, Dehdashti F . Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(17):3745-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.17.3745. View

4.
Kidd E, Siegel B, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Mutic S, Mutch D . Clinical outcomes of definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography simulation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 77(4):1085-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.041. View

5.
Murphy J, Lucas D, Somnay Y, Hamstra D, Ray M . Gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization of human soft tissue sarcoma. Transl Oncol. 2008; 1(1):50-6. PMC: 2510764. DOI: 10.1593/tlo.07121. View