» Articles » PMID: 29272274

Determinants of Magnesium Sulphate Use in Women Hospitalized at <29 Weeks with Severe or Non-severe Pre-eclampsia

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Dec 23
PMID 29272274
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Magnesium sulphate is recommended by international guidelines to prevent eclampsia among women with pre-eclampsia, especially when it is severe, but fewer than 70% of such women receive magnesium sulphate. We aimed to identify variables that prompt Canadian physicians to administer magnesium sulphate to women with pre-eclampsia.

Methods: Data were used from the Canadian Perinatal Network (2005-11) of women hospitalized at <29 weeks' who were thought to be at high risk of delivery due to pre-eclampsia (using broad Canadian definition). Unadjusted analyses of relative risks were estimated directly and population attributable risk percent (PAR%) calculated to identify variables associated with magnesium sulphate use. A multivariable model was created and a generalized estimating equation was used to estimate the adjusted RR that explained magnesium sulphate use in pre-eclampsia. The adjusted PAR% was estimated by bootstrapping.

Results: Of 631 women with pre-eclampsia, 174 (30.1%) had severe pre-eclampsia, of whom 131 (75.3%) received magnesium sulphate. 457 (69.9%) women had non-severe pre-eclamspia, of whom 291 (63.7%) received magnesium sulphate. Use of magnesium sulphate among women with pre-eclampsia could be attributed to the following clinical factors (PAR%): delivery for 'adverse conditions' (48.7%), severe hypertension (21.9%), receipt of antenatal corticosteroids (20.0%), maternal transport prior to delivery (9.9%), heavy proteinuria (7.8%), and interventionist care (3.4%).

Conclusions: Clinicians are more likely to administer magnesium sulphate for eclampsia prophylaxis in the presence of more severe maternal clinical features, in addition to concomitant antenatal corticosteroid administration, and shorter admission to delivery periods related to transport from another institution or plans for interventionist care.

Citing Articles

Maternal Transport, What Do We Know: A Narrative Review.

Barnes S, Sutliff B, Wendel M, Magann E Int J Womens Health. 2024; 16:877-889.

PMID: 38779381 PMC: 11110816. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S461341.


Clinical Effects of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine in Treating Severe Preeclampsia and Its Influence on Maternal and Infant Outcomes after Cesarean Section under Combined Lumbar and Epidural Anesthesia.

Wang X, Wei W, Qi Y, Dong L, Zhang Y Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021; 2021:6366914.

PMID: 34790247 PMC: 8592741. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6366914.


Factors affecting use of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia or eclampsia: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Eddy K, Vogel J, Zahroh R, Bohren M BJOG. 2021; 129(3):379-391.

PMID: 34520111 PMC: 9291451. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16913.


Association of Antenatal Corticosteroids and Magnesium Sulfate Therapy With Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Extremely Preterm Children.

Gentle S, Carlo W, Tan S, Gargano M, Ambalavanan N, Chawla S Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135(6):1377-1386.

PMID: 32459430 PMC: 7278037. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003882.


Perception of Midwives Towards Magnesium Sulfate Use at Chatinkha Maternity Wing in Blantyre, Malawi: A Qualitative Study.

Chikalipo M, Phiri L, Mndolo N, Mbiza C, Khisi P, Golombe E Int J Womens Health. 2020; 12:187-196.

PMID: 32256123 PMC: 7090174. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S223029.

References
1.
Altman D, Carroli G, Duley L, Farrell B, Moodley J, Neilson J . Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 359(9321):1877-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08778-0. View

2.
Helewa M, Burrows R, Smith J, Williams K, Brain P, Rabkin S . Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 1. Definitions, evaluation and classification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. CMAJ. 1997; 157(6):715-25. PMC: 1228113. View

3.
Simon J, Gray A, Duley L . Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic magnesium sulphate for 9996 women with pre-eclampsia from 33 countries: economic evaluation of the Magpie Trial. BJOG. 2006; 113(2):144-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00785.x. View

4.
von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino J, Broughton Pipkin F, Cote A . Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2010; 377(9761):219-27. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7. View

5.
. Which anticonvulsant for women with eclampsia? Evidence from the Collaborative Eclampsia Trial. Lancet. 1995; 345(8963):1455-63. View