» Articles » PMID: 29271386

Development of Bariatric and Metabolic Endoscopy

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Dec 23
PMID 29271386
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: With the evolution of society and changes in human lifestyle, obesity is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide, and obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and coronary heart disease are more common. As a result, new devices and methods for bariatric and metabolic endoscopy are being developed for clinical use, offering new options for patients. This review discussed the progress in bariatric and metabolic endoscopy.

Data Sources: This review was based on data in articles published in the PubMed database up to September 2017, with the following keywords: "obesity", "endoscopy", "weight loss", and "metabolism".

Study Selection: Original articles about various endoscopic methods of weight loss and other reviews of bariatric and metabolic endoscopy were included and analyzed.

Results: The technology of bariatric and metabolic endoscopy has advanced rapidly in recent years. The intragastric balloon (IGB), with its comparatively long period of development, is the most mature and widely used instrument. Multiple new endoscopic devices have been created in recent years, with different targets to achieve weight loss. Despite the proliferation of new devices, the lack of clinical data results in a shortage of clinical experience and instruction in the use of this new equipment.

Conclusions: Bariatric and metabolic endoscopy would help obese people lose weight or prepare for bariatric surgery and hopefully alleviate some of the complications of bariatric procedures. Adequate studies and data are still needed for the new endoscopic devices.

Citing Articles

Management of diabesity: Current concepts.

Michaelidou M, Pappachan J, Jeeyavudeen M World J Diabetes. 2023; 14(4):396-411.

PMID: 37122433 PMC: 10130896. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i4.396.


Strategies in the Management of Adolescent Obesity.

Johnson V, Cao M, Czepiel K, Mushannen T, Nolen L, Stanford F Curr Pediatr Rep. 2020; 8(2):56-65.

PMID: 32632353 PMC: 7337011. DOI: 10.1007/s40124-020-00214-9.

References
1.
Deviere J, Ojeda Valdes G, Cuevas Herrera L, Closset J, Le Moine O, Eisendrath P . Safety, feasibility and weight loss after transoral gastroplasty: First human multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2007; 22(3):589-98. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9662-5. View

2.
Sandler B, Rumbaut R, Swain C, Torres G, Morales L, Gonzales L . Human experience with an endoluminal, endoscopic, gastrojejunal bypass sleeve. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25(9):3028-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1665-6. View

3.
Abu Dayyeh B, Jirapinyo P, Weitzner Z, Barker C, Flicker M, Lautz D . Endoscopic sclerotherapy for the treatment of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes, complications, and predictors of response in 575 procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76(2):275-82. PMC: 4428559. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.1407. View

4.
Abu Dayyeh B, Kumar N, Edmundowicz S, Jonnalagadda S, Larsen M, Sullivan S . ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82(3):425-38.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1964. View

5.
Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Weiss G, Oldham Jr J, Denk P, Borao F . Incisionless revision of post-Roux-en-Y bypass stomal and pouch dilation: multicenter registry results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010; 6(3):290-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.12.011. View