» Articles » PMID: 29271246

Evaluation of a Faecal Dysbiosis Test for Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Subjects with and Without Obesity

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Dec 23
PMID 29271246
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biomarkers for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are demanded. An altered faecal microbiome has been reported in subjects with IBS and could be a valuable biomarker. This study evaluated the diagnostic properties of a new test for faecal dysbiosis, designed to distinguish IBS from healthy volunteers and compared the prevalence rates of dysbiosis related to IBS and morbid obesity. Subjects with and without morbid obesity and IBS were included. The faecal microbiota was assessed with GA-map Dysbiosis Test (Genetic Analysis AS, Oslo, Norway). The test result was given as dysbiosis (yes/no). Comparisons were made between four groups: subjects with IBS and morbid obesity (IBS+/MO+); subjects without IBS and with morbid obesity (IBS-/MO+); subjects with IBS and without morbid obesity (IBS+/MO-); and healthy volunteers (IBS-/MO-).The prevalence rates of dysbiosis in the groups IBS+/MO+, IBS-/MO+, IBS+/MO- and IBS-/MO- were 18/28 (64%), 45/71 (63%), 31/63 (49%) and 38/91 (42%). Dysbiosis was more prevalent in subjects with morbid obesity, both in those with and without IBS, than in healthy volunteers (p values .04 and .006). Used as a diagnostic test for IBS in subjects without morbid obesity, the positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) were 1.18 (0.83-1.67) and 0.87 (0.65-1.18), respectively, and in subjects with morbid obesity the LR were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.73-1.41) and 0.98 (0.54-1.75) respectively. The dysbiosis test was unsuitable as a diagnostic test for IBS. Dysbiosis was statistically significantly associated with morbid obesity, but not with IBS.

Citing Articles

Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of fecal microbiota transplantation in severe obesity: a study protocol.

Hanssen H, Fjellstad M, Skjevling L, Johnsen P, Kulseng B, Goll R BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e073242.

PMID: 38151280 PMC: 11148707. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073242.


Determining Gut Microbial Dysbiosis: a Review of Applied Indexes for Assessment of Intestinal Microbiota Imbalances.

Wei S, Bahl M, Dahl Baunwall S, Lodberg Hvas C, Rask Licht T Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021; 87(11).

PMID: 33741632 PMC: 8208139. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00395-21.


Clinical Management of the Microbiome in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Andrews C, Sidani S, Marshall J J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2021; 4(1):36-43.

PMID: 33644675 PMC: 7898379. DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwz037.


Separating "good" from "bad" faecal dysbiosis - evidence from two cross-sectional studies.

Farup P, Aasbrenn M, Valeur J BMC Obes. 2018; 5:30.

PMID: 30524735 PMC: 6276176. DOI: 10.1186/s40608-018-0207-3.


Role of Gut Microbiota-Gut Hormone Axis in the Pathophysiology of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

Fukui H, Xu X, Miwa H J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 24(3):367-386.

PMID: 29969855 PMC: 6034676. DOI: 10.5056/jnm18071.